TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Where have you gone, Peter Norton?

127 点作者 technologizer将近 11 年前

18 条评论

kschua将近 11 年前
Peter Norton was my hero way back in the late 80&#x27;s to early 90&#x27;s.<p>I remember the first time I used Unerase to recover a deleted file and was fascinated by it. Then I discovered DiskEdit and began poking around in the FAT system and found out more about how DOS actually deletes a file. It actually marks the first character with a ?. Thus started my hacking days.<p>Then I used DiskEdit to bypass copy protection hacking the byte codes.<p>DiskEdit rescued me again when I switch to DR-DOS, set passwords on my files and forgot the passwords (fwiw, it was just setting the next dozen or so bytes after the file name in the FAT to zero)<p>Such memomories, DiskEdit and SideKick were my two must have utilities in the days of DOS
评论 #7857029 未加载
评论 #7857858 未加载
评论 #7856861 未加载
评论 #7856453 未加载
评论 #7857137 未加载
评论 #7856973 未加载
jwr将近 11 年前
Which reminds me that to this day there is no good replacement for Norton Commander (for UNIX systems, of course).<p>Please, don&#x27;t even start mentioning Midnight Commander. It is nowhere near as good. Oh, sure, it has a bazillion fancy features, but it just doesn&#x27;t work that well, isn&#x27;t as smooth as the original was. Remember, kids, not every file manager that has two panes can be called a &quot;Norton Commander replacement&quot;!<p>Those of us who grew up using Norton Commander still look at the redesigned (&quot;improved&quot;) numpads on modern keyboards and shake their head in horror and disbelief, remapping those keys to what they Should Be.
评论 #7856944 未加载
评论 #7857498 未加载
评论 #7859742 未加载
评论 #7856738 未加载
评论 #7856722 未加载
评论 #7859416 未加载
评论 #7856784 未加载
评论 #7859917 未加载
评论 #7859785 未加载
评论 #7857473 未加载
评论 #7857082 未加载
jacquesm将近 11 年前
Disassembling the Norton Utilities and annotating them was an excellent way to learn how to program X86, I&#x27;m not sure if by then Peter was still writing himself or too busy managing his growing empire but that was some pretty tight code. Think &#x27;gnu base utils&#x27; but instead of in C a good chunk of it (if not all) was in assembler.<p>It&#x27;s a pity the article does not really answer the question in the title, Peter is simply getting older (he&#x27;s probably in his 70&#x27;s now). Here he is at some function a few years ago, looking happy and well:<p><a href="http://i558.photobucket.com/albums/ss23/Image-Gallery/norton.jpg" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;i558.photobucket.com&#x2F;albums&#x2F;ss23&#x2F;Image-Gallery&#x2F;norton...</a><p>I wish him a very long life and much joy, he&#x27;s done a ton of good for the PC industry and his books on low level PC stuff were quite useful.
评论 #7860470 未加载
评论 #7856995 未加载
shmerl将近 11 年前
Midnight Commander lives on :)<p>For those unfamiliar, it&#x27;s a remake of the Norton Commander for Linux &#x2F; Unix: <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norton_Commander" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Norton_Commander</a>
评论 #7856570 未加载
评论 #7856455 未加载
评论 #7856442 未加载
评论 #7856478 未加载
kayoone将近 11 年前
It was a different time obviously but still goes to show you can still achieve great things even if you are not the typical 20-something hacker anymore ;) Peter Norton was around 40 years old when he first released Norton Utilities and started that remarkable part of his career. Given the time, he probably didn&#x27;t even start programming until he was 30.
easytiger将近 11 年前
This article poses a question it never really answers to one&#x27;s satisfaction
评论 #7857935 未加载
评论 #7860823 未加载
SeanDav将近 11 年前
Peter Norton&#x27;s books, or at least the ones he wrote himself initially, were wonderfully clear and well written, even though they absolutely got down to the bare metal. I kept my copies for many years because I could not bring myself to get rid of them.
mixmastamyk将近 11 年前
I worked at symc for a while and the conventional wisdom was that taking Norton off the boxes was a way to reduce the royalties that needed to be paid to him.<p>There is also a line of enterprise products dubbed &quot;Symantec Antivirus&quot; that reduces royalties even further.
mschuster91将近 11 年前
Too bad that these days Symantec&#x2F;Norton AV is more known for 1) being installed on millions of PCs by the manufacturer, including on the recovery CDs and 2) being a performance sucker. Norton&#x2F;Symantec AV is best called crapware these days.<p>First thing I do on every client&#x27;s computer is remove Norton&#x2F;Symantec, solves about 50% of the &quot;why is my PC slow&quot; questions
评论 #7860705 未加载
fasteo将近 11 年前
I will always remember the nights I spent reading Norton books to write my first (and only) TSR (Terminate and State Resident) program: Upon detecting a floppy disk inserted in A: or B: it would ask for a password before granting access.<p>Ahh, I am getting old.
ternaryoperator将近 11 年前
Anyone remember the Norton Editor? One of the first commercial text editors. And actually decent for it&#x27;s time.
评论 #7857555 未加载
throwwit将近 11 年前
Norton Desktop, an EGA monitor, and Windows 3.11 had some early magic.
general_failure将近 11 年前
Norton ghost was quite awesome. It was the poor man&#x27;s VM.
sdegutis将近 11 年前
It&#x27;s kind of interesting how both Norton and McAfee faded into obscurity (or tried to) after publishing and eventually detaching from security software -- and probably not coincidental.
评论 #7857400 未加载
rhuppert将近 11 年前
For those questioning why Peter Norton had his arms crossed, he was waiting for Windows to load.
darksim905将近 11 年前
Screw Peter Norton, I want to know what happened to Patrick Norton! :(
sequencepoint将近 11 年前
Surprised not to see the Norton Guides being mentioned yet :-)
feld将近 11 年前
But what about <i>NORMAN</i> Antivirus?