TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Twitter for email

16 点作者 xyclos将近 11 年前

12 条评论

farmdawgnation将近 11 年前
Like some of the other commenters, I remain a bit perplexed by this. I realize we all live busy lives, but the idea of long form communication going the way of the dodo seems counterintuitive to me. There will always be a need for someone to send me a message longer than 350 characters periodically. I don&#x27;t understand how this actually changes that need.<p>I&#x27;m also not so much a fan of the fact that this service will auto respond to people saying they should send a shorter email. That&#x27;s kind of... jerk-like to be honest. I can see how it would be desirable to someone who just gets too much email, but I would posit that the better solution is to reduce the amount of email you&#x27;re receiving or exercise more aggressive filtering.
评论 #7873894 未加载
评论 #7873812 未加载
评论 #7872676 未加载
nathas将近 11 年前
I literally can&#x27;t think of a single reason why I&#x27;d use this... Maybe it&#x27;s the Next Big Thing but what&#x27;s the target market?<p>* Who is the customer?<p>* What is the pain point?<p>* How do you make money?
评论 #7872362 未加载
评论 #7873851 未加载
评论 #7872734 未加载
cones688将近 11 年前
&gt; all emails are shown in your feed with no need to open threads to read or reply.<p>Do people just sit and read email all day, surely you then have to &quot;action&quot; them at the very least? In which case you then have to go merrily scrolling back up to see which ones you missed whilst you weren&#x27;t intently staring at your news feed of emails.<p>I&#x27;d be interested to know who the devs are targetting here? Is there a certain business area?
hihat将近 11 年前
You mention on your site that you pull from my existing email accounts. What happens to existing messages that exceed 350 characters?
notjustanymike将近 11 年前
I think there&#x27;s some good ideas here, overshadowed by the the 350 character limit. A scannable truncated feed of all your emails is worth considering, and that&#x27;s what they should be pitching.<p>The passive aggressive auto-responder is a massively bad idea though. Between clients, VIPs, and dear family members, I imagine the number of fuck you&#x27;s sent to important people would massively outweigh the benefits of automated snark.<p>Let&#x27;s also not forget that some companies have ridiculous email signature policies. Ours is fairly sane and I&#x27;m still looking at over 100 characters.
weego将近 11 年前
Who on earth would ever want to limit characters in an email. Am I missing some subtle lampooning in the copy that explains this things existence?
评论 #7872245 未加载
评论 #7872195 未加载
mccolin将近 11 年前
This is as good an idea as a Jump to Conclusions mat.
评论 #7872473 未加载
flavor8将近 11 年前
Why would they name it toastio and not own the toast.io domain? That seems like they&#x27;re trying to be hipster but missing the point.
prawn将近 11 年前
Screenshots, even showing fragments of the concepts, would be helpful. The idea seems a little odd and not something I could see myself using, but I still want to see how it might look.
bcardarella将近 11 年前
Isn&#x27;t this exactly what ShortMail was? <a href="https://shortmail.com/" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;shortmail.com&#x2F;</a> (only less characters)
halostatue将近 11 年前
I&#x27;m not sure how this is different than <a href="https://shortmail.com/" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;shortmail.com&#x2F;</a>.
homersapien将近 11 年前
Late April fools joke?