TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Show HN: Ladder, find a new startup job anonymously

46 点作者 brackin将近 11 年前

12 条评论

taariqlewis将近 11 年前
A very busy space. The true demand is that you have lots of passive talent signing up. These folks are highly valued, but it&#x27;s not clear how you get passive seekers (who aren&#x27;t interested in moving unless they get excited) to make a change. Active seekers are already in the ATS&#x27; of ALL your recruiting companies. They aren&#x27;t that valuable. So, you have lots to do here.<p>Your competitors at Hired.com and elsewhere are investing big money to compete to move passives into active mode. I wish you the best of luck, but competition here is brutal and it&#x27;s not clear what your unique value proposition or edge is here.<p>Lastly, &quot;anonymous job searches&quot; is the way of the passive seeker, but it&#x27;s very hard to get them to make a decision. The chain of interaction requires much more ways to engage than their filling out a few boxes on what they do and where they live&#x2F;email. If you could bring to the surface things that passives like but will not reveal to just anyone, you may be able to create an edge. However, it&#x27;s tough meng. It&#x27;s tough out there for a recruiting platform.
评论 #7875052 未加载
评论 #7875769 未加载
评论 #7875039 未加载
timcederman将近 11 年前
What do these calls-to-action mean?<p>[hiring] [tech talent]<p>I have no idea what either are going to do.<p>Also, when I click on &quot;tech talent&quot;, this is confusing:<p>&quot;What role are you looking for? We only accept high quality companies that are actively hiring.&quot;<p>It sounds like you&#x27;re trying to qualify me applying...but you&#x27;re actually talking about which companies you may or may not refer to me. I understand you&#x27;re trying to make your value prop clear, but it&#x27;s just confusing at this point.
评论 #7874903 未加载
dyadic将近 11 年前
I really dislike the use of &quot;Full Stack Developer&quot; and especially when I&#x27;m pushed into that box by the only other choices being FE and iOS dev.
评论 #7875044 未加载
评论 #7875047 未加载
评论 #7875088 未加载
thinkt4nk将近 11 年前
Am I missing something? You&#x27;ve essentially started a tech recruitment firm, right? Is there something novel about your business?
评论 #7875010 未加载
brackin将近 11 年前
We quietly launched about a week ago and have already seen good quality and experience from technical talent. With 50+ engineers, designers, PM&#x27;s on the platform. Some with 15 years of experience in their field or previous experience leading teams at well known companies<p>Co-founders of startups are signing up to find something new, PM&#x27;s at tech companies are looking to join startups and engineers that think they might want to try something new are getting options.<p>We speak to every signup to evaluate if they&#x27;re right for the platform and if we can find the right role for them. Once a company and employee are matched, they can communicate directly through their own process.
pauldino将近 11 年前
Was there any concern about a trademark conflict with TheLadders?
评论 #7874782 未加载
eroo将近 11 年前
If you wouldn&#x27;t mind providing some insight, I&#x27;m curious what your approach is to verifying a hire is w.r.t. collecting commission?
评论 #7874687 未加载
fiatjaf将近 11 年前
5% of salary? Forever? Are you crazy?
评论 #7874810 未加载
phantom_oracle将近 11 年前
Add &quot;remote&quot; as a location and your signups will probably increase by double or more.
评论 #7875512 未加载
Smutchings将近 11 年前
As someone who works at Typeform, it&#x27;s AWESOME to see people using our product to make MVPs like this.<p>Best of luck, it&#x27;s an interesting concept. (And one I could have done with a few years back).
MadMoogle将近 11 年前
Why is github or online portfolio a requirement? It doesn&#x27;t explain what&#x27;s being verified, or what we should do if we don&#x27;t have either of those things.
lauradhamilton将近 11 年前
You misspelled &quot;discreetly.&quot;
评论 #7874653 未加载