TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Live From Amazon’s Phone Event

68 点作者 aashaykumar92将近 11 年前

20 条评论

GrantS将近 11 年前
As a computer vision researcher, I am impressed that Amazon has made the most computer-vision-centric mobile device seen to date. I have no idea if it will catch on, but having a dedicated physical button for object recognition is huge insofar as it means they actually intend for people to be using this all the time, so they&#x27;ll only be devoting more and more energy to recognizing everything in the world. Sure, it&#x27;s mostly so you can then buy those things from Amazon, but I have to think there will be other useful applications given the provided recognition SDK.<p>I&#x27;m also curious if developers will have direct access to the four corner cameras on the front, and if the head-tracking it uses for 3D visual effects includes detailed eye&#x2F;pupil-tracking -- if it doesn&#x27;t yet, you can be sure that&#x27;s planned for the future.<p>Edit: So the dedicated recognition button will already pull up wikipedia entries for recognized works of art. I wonder if they&#x27;ll ever let third party developers hook into the hardware button so that third party plant-recognition, insect-recognition, action-figure recognition (etc) app results can be called up with that single button push in case Amazon doesn&#x27;t recognize a purchasable item.
评论 #7911798 未加载
ashbrahma将近 11 年前
This phone is exclusive to AT&amp;T. Not sure why this late in the game they would want to sell only through one carrier and that too AT&amp;T!
评论 #7911957 未加载
评论 #7911969 未加载
评论 #7912410 未加载
评论 #7911975 未加载
fumar将近 11 年前
I am looking at this from a media consumption perspective. While Apple, Google, and Microsoft (and OEMS) try to out do each other in the spec race. Amazon has always catered to users consumer habits. From their early beginning selling books to their entrance (dominance) with digital books, Amazon has always focused on facilitating content&#x2F;media&#x2F;physical goods consumption. The Kindle Fire tablets have led up to this phone. This phone will succeed in facilitating users to purchase from Amazon and Amazon alone.
评论 #7911863 未加载
评论 #7912260 未加载
评论 #7911891 未加载
suprgeek将近 11 年前
Surprisingly high price, even on contract! I was thinking they would pull another Prime tie-in (say $49 as long as you are on prime and do not cancel).<p>Also in this day and age, being AT&amp;T exclusive is a real puzzler. What does Amazon hope to gain by this?<p>Jeff is usually lauded for his OOTB thinking but here we see all the hall marks of following the very beaten path...<p>Edit: And there it is! Includes a year of prime with the price of the phone (as revealed at the end)
评论 #7912128 未加载
untog将近 11 年前
$200 price point is silly for a device that seems to be fine-tuned to make you buy things. They should be selling it at a loss, not charging the same as an iPhone.
评论 #7912144 未加载
jusben1369将近 11 年前
So far there&#x27;s nothing all that new or earth shattering. (although those no tangle earbuds look nice) I felt like this phone was going to be super tied in to payments but so far no. I wonder if it&#x27;s a smartphone aimed at the &#x27;rest of us&#x27; who are intimidated by iPhone and Android?
评论 #7911782 未加载
评论 #7911846 未加载
评论 #7911778 未加载
评论 #7911930 未加载
JohnTHaller将近 11 年前
It&#x27;s $199 with a 2 year contract with AT&amp;T, meaning it&#x27;s a $649 phone (now confirmed). It&#x27;s priced with other &#x27;premium&#x27; phones like the iPhone 5S and the Galaxy S5 (both $199 with a 2 year contract, $649 off contract at AT&amp;T). Unfortunately, Amazon&#x27;s other products like the Kindle Fire are anything but premium hardware and software-wise. On the software side this is partially due to the Amazon-first mentality for all media and partially due to the extremely clunky Amazon UI and app store. Then again, I wouldn&#x27;t consider Samsung a &#x27;premium&#x27; phone software-wise either due to my poor experience with the Galaxy S4&#x27;s clunky setup after coming form &#x27;pure&#x27; Android. It&#x27;s still far better than the Kindle Fire, though.
Nicholas_C将近 11 年前
No word on the battery. Will this be yet another phone I have to strategically place chargers in my car, office, and home for because it&#x27;s down to 15% by 2PM?
评论 #7911994 未加载
评论 #7912148 未加载
ChikkaChiChi将近 11 年前
I can&#x27;t decide whether Amazon should be credited for trying out new things and pushing technology forward or criticized for their stupid attempts at locking you in to their infrastructure.<p>Fire TV was the same way. Cool device except that everything that wasn&#x27;t Amazon was a second class citizen.
rickyc091将近 11 年前
Ouch exclusive to AT&amp;T + $199, 2 year contract. Anyone think this is going to sell?
评论 #7911962 未加载
评论 #7912007 未加载
ignostic将近 11 年前
Everyone thought Amazon would undercut, but it makes sense that Amazon is targeting high-end flagship phones with the device. They&#x27;re definitely not messing around. The 3d features are obviously unique, and the camera makes it a serious contender for the 1-device crowd. The Android base gives it an instant familiarity. It remains to be seen whether FireOS is going to be easy to adopt.<p>I&#x27;m disappointed by the AT&amp;T exclusivity, but I actually see good reasons behind it. Amazon is new at phones, and they&#x27;ve had limited success with advertising campaigns. AT&amp;T is still big enough to throw money around, but they&#x27;re haemorrhaging users shockingly fast. AT&amp;T has an incentive to market Amazon&#x27;s product, and they should be willing to given the success the iPhone brought them. Amazon has something AT&amp;T wants, and they&#x27;ll pay for it once with the contract and twice for advertising. AT&amp;T will basically offer Amazon a strong market foothold.<p>The announcement said the screen was 720p and the product page says 1080p. Was this just a mistake from Bezos?
isaacn将近 11 年前
Here&#x27;s a link to the Amazon detail page for the Fire Phone: <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/B00EOE0WKQ" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.amazon.com&#x2F;dp&#x2F;B00EOE0WKQ</a>
aresant将近 11 年前
&quot;Unlimited Free Photo Storage&quot; is huge.<p>I would estimate that 80% of my current DropBox capacity is photos alone.<p>I hope Amazon nails this and forces Apple &amp; DropBox to respond.
评论 #7911835 未加载
评论 #7911721 未加载
评论 #7911752 未加载
denzil_correa将近 11 年前
I am eager to see the tangle free design for earphones via flat cables. I hope it is not a PR stunt.<p>Context - <a href="http://tctechcrunch2011.files.wordpress.com/2014/06/img_4425.jpg?w=680" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;tctechcrunch2011.files.wordpress.com&#x2F;2014&#x2F;06&#x2F;img_4425...</a>
评论 #7911813 未加载
评论 #7912228 未加载
Fuzzwah将近 11 年前
The head tracking controlled perspective changes in 3D games seems like it&#x27;ll be awesome.
评论 #7911926 未加载
jsumrall将近 11 年前
Not sure why they would only want to sell this in the US. This exclusive deal with ATT ruins any chance of this being successful in this age of contract free phones and the cheap Nexus line.
mrbill将近 11 年前
I would have ordered it instantly at up to $199 carrier-free.<p>$199 with a 2-year ATT contract? Pfft. No way (and I&#x27;m a long-time Prime customer with a FireTV and multiple Kindles).
评论 #7912893 未加载
chiph将近 11 年前
Video predictive caching? I would assume this isn&#x27;t on the phone, unless they got a sweetheart bandwidth deal with AT&amp;T.
评论 #7911742 未加载
talles将近 11 年前
Anyone wonders why on earth they (Amazon) don&#x27;t live stream it? I see only benefits in doing it...
chrisBob将近 11 年前
What does $27&#x2F;month mean? Surely no one would pay $27&#x2F;month instead of $199 up front.
评论 #7912057 未加载
评论 #7912214 未加载
评论 #7912140 未加载
评论 #7912068 未加载