TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Automating Formal Proofs for Reactive Systems

74 点作者 jervisfm将近 11 年前

3 条评论

squirrel将近 11 年前
Hoping to read in detail later, but very interesting at first glance thanks!<p>Have thought for awhile that many systems would benefit from one or more &quot;guard&quot; components for which we have formal proofs that no bad things can happen - e.g. you write an equity trading application in Python, but route all the trades through a checker that ensures you aren&#x27;t trading too much or too often [1].<p>[1] See Knight Capital 2012, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knight_Capital_Group#2012_stock_trading_disruption" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Knight_Capital_Group#2012_stock...</a>
评论 #7928569 未加载
sorincos将近 11 年前
So one builds a model in Reflex based on the requirements, then tests that model. Even when the requirements are complete (which often they are not), the real life implementation afterwards may still bring zillions of problems (my own bugs, using a bad framework, whatever) which this model testing cannot catch... eh.
评论 #7931684 未加载
Majka将近 11 年前
Interesting approach, I can see this being of great use, I will definitely take a closer look. also, nice video- especially the soccer references.