TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Google Domains

362 点作者 jnymck将近 11 年前

50 条评论

ep103将近 11 年前
So now my domains can be hosted by a company famed for its responsive and transparent customer service!
评论 #7934121 未加载
评论 #7934173 未加载
评论 #7934085 未加载
评论 #7934131 未加载
评论 #7934638 未加载
评论 #7934133 未加载
评论 #7934204 未加载
评论 #7934113 未加载
评论 #7936646 未加载
toomuchtodo将近 11 年前
<a href="http://domains.google.com/about/features.html" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;domains.google.com&#x2F;about&#x2F;features.html</a><p>Integration with Google cloud resources (a la AWS Route 53), 10 million lookups&#x2F;year free, pricing appears off the bat to be $12&#x2F;year, free private registration.<p>And support! &quot;With Google Domains, you get phone and email support (M-F, 9am to 9pm EST).&quot;
评论 #7933993 未加载
评论 #7934447 未加载
评论 #7935558 未加载
评论 #7936826 未加载
joeframbach将近 11 年前
Serious question: What happens in three years when Google decides to &quot;sunset&quot; this service like Wave, Labs, Reader, Buzz, Code Search, Knol, etc? Their target audience doesn&#x27;t know how to work with registrars, which puts them in the worst possible situation when Google Domains is dropped. Will they help their users transition to other registrars?
评论 #7935116 未加载
评论 #7935372 未加载
评论 #7934168 未加载
评论 #7935761 未加载
评论 #7937143 未加载
评论 #7934221 未加载
评论 #7936278 未加载
spindritf将近 11 年前
This is great. Google is a company that is very serious about security, and has essentially no customer support so no way to social engineer your way around that security. Perfect for domains.
评论 #7934627 未加载
评论 #7934728 未加载
chatmasta将近 11 年前
So it is now possible to give Google, who is solely responsible for a high percentage of your site&#x27;s traffic, access to:<p>- Your traffic (Search)<p>- Your analytics (Analytics)<p>- Your income (AdSense)<p>- Your advertising (AdWords)<p>- Your hosting (App Engine)<p>- Your DNS (Cloud DNS)<p>- Your domains (this)<p>That gives their search algorithm a pretty full picture of who owns your website, where you get your content, how much customers like it, any other sites you own, how much traffic you get, how much money you make.<p>And they can delist you whenever they want.<p>No thanks. I&#x27;ll keep my Google to a minimum.
评论 #7936598 未加载
评论 #7937060 未加载
rhizome将近 11 年前
Not on your life. Domains simply aren&#x27;t complicated or expensive enough to think twice about feeding Google&#x27;s consolidation and analytics game. Perhaps harsh, but come on. Domains.
评论 #7934081 未加载
Thiz将近 11 年前
They stole $200 from my adsense account accusing me of clicking my own ads, which I never did. Their automated system never let me prove I didn&#x27;t do it so they just stole my money.<p>I give a flying fuck if I was a false positive in a huge corporation with millions of customers they can&#x27;t serve all with quality support.<p>No, Im not giving them my business never again until they apologize.
评论 #7936138 未加载
tdicola将近 11 年前
I don&#x27;t get it, I already have a domain managed by Google with my Google apps account. I understand they shut off this service for new signups a while back. So are they releasing a _new_ managed domain service? How long until I am forced to go through some ugly merge process to put my Google apps account onto this new system? Would really love to hear the rationale for killing the old service to replace it with something that looks a heck of a lot like the old service. After shutting down Reader and all the trouble my Google apps account already gives me (every new Google service has issues with Google apps accounts in my experience) and other annoying things I really hope Google doesn&#x27;t screw up my email. If it ain&#x27;t broke don&#x27;t fix it!
评论 #7935447 未加载
eli将近 11 年前
Hasn&#x27;t Google&#x27;s been a registrar for years? You could register a domain for $10 as part of signing up for Apps at least 2 or 3 years ago.<p>I guess the new part is they&#x27;re offering it standalone? Seems like a lead gen effort for AdWords&#x2F;AdSense more than a serious product.
评论 #7934084 未加载
tinkerrr将近 11 年前
&quot;No additional cost for private registration&quot; is badly required in the industry, and glad to see Google take the lead.<p>Also, there should be an option to 301 redirect your blogspot blog to a domain held by Google. Lots of bloggers have outgrown their .blogspot.com blogs.
评论 #7934202 未加载
评论 #7934145 未加载
评论 #7934129 未加载
评论 #7934099 未加载
评论 #7935056 未加载
评论 #7934155 未加载
评论 #7934212 未加载
laureny将近 11 年前
I&#x27;m excited. Not so much by the fact that Google now provides this service (which I may or may not use) but because this is going to put a tremendous amount of pressure on other ISP&#x27;s, and competition is badly needed in this field.
sudonim将近 11 年前
I can&#x27;t be the only one who likes using different businesses for different services? It&#x27;s bad enough to use Google for email, calendar, docs. I wouldn&#x27;t buy with &#x2F; transfer my business domains to them.<p><a href="http://gandi.net" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;gandi.net</a> and <a href="http://dnsimple.com" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;dnsimple.com</a> are both great options in this space.
hysan将近 11 年前
&gt; Talk to us<p>&gt; We aren’t ready for everyone to join yet (you currently need an invitation code to buy or transfer a domain), so we want those who join to play an active role in helping us improve. We&#x27;re working hard to offer our customers the best domain experience possible, and we welcome your input, questions and feedback.<p>For a company that is notoriously bad at communicating with its customers, this is the one thing I would expect Google to not get right. Even at the private invite scale, I seriously wonder if Google will be communicating with customers with the tact and empathy required of good customer service.
vachi将近 11 年前
google has attempted domain names previously, and it has previously sucked, very badly, 1. you could never get to a customer support, no phone number, and emails were all auto responses sending you to faq 2. there was no dedicated dashboard for domain management, billing etc<p>this is a revamp and product consolidation and it is super late to the game, hopefully the transition for current users will be easy
评论 #7934095 未加载
lsh123将近 11 年前
Interesting. Google is going to directly compete with GoDaddy which is about to have IPO. Curious to see the impact on the GoDaddy&#x27;s price.
owenversteeg将近 11 年前
Based on a screenshot [0] the price appears to be $12&#x2F;yr.<p>[0] <a href="http://domains.google.com/about/img/sprites/features.png" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;domains.google.com&#x2F;about&#x2F;img&#x2F;sprites&#x2F;features.png</a>
gmays将近 11 年前
A couple weeks ago when the new Google My Business platform (<a href="http://www.google.com/business/" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.google.com&#x2F;business&#x2F;</a>) was introduced I thought it was very interesting. To me it signaled Google&#x27;s interest in entering the small business game by building a platform for SMBs to have a consolidated online presence.<p>They wouldn&#x27;t have combined the products and created a platform if they didn&#x27;t plan to expand it. I thought about how significant it&#x27;d be if Google included some sort of website builder along with the Google My Business platform. They organically have more reach with SMBs than any competitor can afford to buy. That combined with the high switching costs of websites and they have a massive opportunity as long as they don&#x27;t misunderstand their target market.<p>Now they&#x27;re offering domains and teaming up with some of the biggest website builders out there. I&#x27;d wager that 1) it&#x27;s only a matter of time until their domain service is offered as part of Google My Business and 2) they offer their own website builder&#x2F;CMS.<p>The website builder industry is competitive and noncompetitive at the same time. The companies that spend the most on marketing have the shittiest products and the companies with the most product potential 1) don&#x27;t advertise or 2) don&#x27;t cater to small businesses as much as they should. They&#x27;re all asleep at the wheel in one way or another.
pdknsk将近 11 年前
&gt; Use Google Synthetic Records for integration with Google App Engine, subdomain forwarding and Google Apps setup<p>What is Google Synthetic Records? Google Search doesn&#x27;t know.
评论 #7934137 未加载
lwh将近 11 年前
Will my pagerank increase if I register with one of their TLDs?
vowelless将近 11 年前
&gt; Create up to 100 email aliases with your domain, such as help@your_company.com or sales@your_company.com, and have them forwarded to existing email accounts, like you@gmail.com. This way, your email is a professional reflection of your business.<p>So there are no actual email boxes included?
评论 #7935937 未加载
评论 #7934299 未加载
评论 #7934293 未加载
jqueryin将近 11 年前
Just as an aside, the startup I work at provides these services with Google Apps included. We handle automatic domain registration, DNS setup, automate the process of verifying your Google Apps account, allow Single Sign-On to GMail, and more. I&#x27;m guessing the tech crowd would particularly find the automated google verification interesting.<p>The other best part is we match the pricing of a Google Apps for Business account and offer a <i>15 day free trial</i> with no credit card required.<p>We partner with the likes of Startup Weekend and .CO since our goal is to help you get your ideas online fast.<p>For those of you interested in checking it out, I&#x27;d love feedback:<p><a href="https://pop.co" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;pop.co</a>
评论 #7934519 未加载
评论 #7934402 未加载
评论 #7934389 未加载
pyrophane将近 11 年前
Any idea what TLDs they currently support?
nospecinterests将近 11 年前
prediction:<p>Lots of people will sign-up. These people will love the service. They will come to need this service for their businesses to survive and function properly. Two years afterward Google will do what they have done time and time again, close down the service - for unknown reasons - at every users expense.<p>Will it happen? I don&#x27;t know but they just don&#x27;t have my trust for the long term. Yes, I know that you can transfer domains fairly easily but nothing is ever that easy.
andrewgjohnson将近 11 年前
Continues to surprise me that there isn&#x27;t some kind of registrar service as part of the suite of services provided via AWS. I suppose ditto to the Google Cloud platform. This is great, I&#x27;m especially drawn to the built in &quot;up to 100&quot; email aliases. Sounds like it may only cover the receiving of @your_company.com emails and not sending but definitely a nice start, particularly in a Google Apps is pay-only world.
insky将近 11 年前
I remember getting my Bigfoot for life email address. It didn&#x27;t exactly last that long. But basically that was email forwarding. But you had to change your reply-to in outgoing emails, and it was a little confusing for recipients.<p>Email forwarding, doesn&#x27;t stop Google reading the mail as it goes through transit. Which is a little unsettling. I&#x27;d be interested to hear&#x2F;read their privacy policy regarding this.
tambourine_man将近 11 年前
I&#x27;m glad they are more focused on their core competences and are not distracted by side projects.<p>I&#x27;m also glad to see the amount of work that went on developing this site, white text over white background, for example, is super readable. Sweating the details indeed.<p><a href="http://i.imgur.com/rcTAu9l.jpg" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;i.imgur.com&#x2F;rcTAu9l.jpg</a>
评论 #7936081 未加载
bhartzer将近 11 年前
Really, Google? You are calling the new gTLDs &quot;domain endings&quot;? Is that what we&#x27;re supposed to call them?
评论 #7935426 未加载
评论 #7934810 未加载
评论 #7936586 未加载
nachteilig将近 11 年前
Right now I have a reseller account with OpenSRS&#x2F;Tucows, and I have to say that this service from Google interests me. OpenSRS has seemingly been stuck in the 90s with UI stuff for a while now, and recently started charing $3&#x2F;year extra for private registration.<p>Looks like I&#x27;ll give it a try as soon as I get an invite.
robomartin将近 11 年前
Right or wrong, and from more than one angle, this is the way I look at it:<p>First, the last thing I want on the internet is a monopoly. Google, for all intents and purposes, is a monopoly when it comes to search and advertising. Because of that it has unique power to attempt to own other areas. If Google was known for great customer service and generally benevolent behavior this might be OK. The reality is that many of us have had really ugly experiences with this company.<p>I don&#x27;t buy the distinction being made in terms of paid vs. unpaid services. Every Google service is paid. Every single one of them. Don&#x27;t think so? Then why doesn&#x27;t Google turn off ads on &quot;free&quot; services? No, people are paying with cash or with eyeballs-on-adds. Either way Google is monetizing each and every set of eyeballs in some way. &quot;Free&quot; is an illusion.<p>Competition is great, but Google is not a competitor it&#x27;s a nassive search monopoly that could easily use that monopoly to favor any one of it&#x27;s products over competitors who depend on Google search and rankings for their very survival.<p>At a minimum it is a potentially huge conflict of interest. If Google registers your domains, hosts your sites, runs your ads, places ads on your site, runs your email, provides your analytics and provides your search-based traffic you are one button click away from various incredible nightmare scenario each and every morning 365 days per year.<p>So, no, thanks, but no. I&#x27;ve been saying &quot;no&quot; to you for years, ever since that time you behaved badly, cost my clients a huge chunk of their business and all we could do was scream at a computer monitor.<p>No, thank you. I will stick with other excellent choices for domain registration. I will also stick to Linode and AWS for my servers. And I will stick to building sites supported by something other than advertising revenue. I will also host my own email, which isn&#x27;t hard at all. I will use your analytics and, if needed, I will do some advertising with you. Alhough, lately, using Facebook intelligently for that last part is producing better results.<p>In other words, having learned my lessons I will not allow my clients or myself to walk into a situation where you can hurt us by behaving as you often do.<p>I just can&#x27;t see trusting Google. Trust is one of those things that costs massively more to regain once lost. Google has done absolutley nothing to regain the trust of those of us who have seen what can happen.<p>Live long and prosper.
kolev将近 11 年前
At $12&#x2F;year, I&#x27;m not leaving GoDaddy, which pricing nobody can beat. With the Domain Club pricing, I get .com at $8.19. The only thing GoDaddy lacks is an API, but can&#x27;t pay 50% just for this luxury.
dcc1将近 11 年前
1. Can&#x27;t pay with bitcoin so staying with namecheap<p>2. Google offers 0 support<p>3. Google rolls over to quickly to copyright requests, whats to stop them from pulling the domain from under you<p>No thanks
评论 #7939950 未加载
briholt将近 11 年前
Is there nothing Google won&#x27;t compete with?
评论 #7934096 未加载
评论 #7934107 未加载
joell将近 11 年前
Request Invite:<p><a href="https://domains.google.com/registrar" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;domains.google.com&#x2F;registrar</a>
kin将近 11 年前
Great news to me, recently switched from GoDaddy to Namecheap and I still don&#x27;t like the experience.
waitingkuo将近 11 年前
Is it a Business as a Service? Seems it&#x27;ll integrate lots of SaaS such like Shopify, Weebly, ...etc
fuzz_junket将近 11 年前
Oh look. An opportunity to let Google own even more of the Internet. Let&#x27;s do it.
stormbrew将近 11 年前
Free whois privacy. Hopefully this pushes some other dns providers to do the same.
评论 #7935404 未加载
评论 #7935427 未加载
thegeomaster将近 11 年前
Any suggestions on how one gets an invite? How broad is the program?
southflorida将近 11 年前
and speed of site will never be an issue (host wise)... and indexing out the gate. wish i would have waited to buy that domain i just had to have saturday night :&#x2F;
评论 #7934158 未加载
esbonsa将近 11 年前
Have you purchased a domain name before? yes and no...
jonthn将近 11 年前
When a giant shakes, everyone moves. It doesn&#x27;t even have to be particularly disruptive -- this is good for everyone who owns or brokers domains.
saeedjabbar将近 11 年前
Looking forward to giving this a shot.
pstop将近 11 年前
An invite only beta to an at request service? That&#x27;s kinda dumb. It most certainly won&#x27;t be a representative sample.
评论 #7935376 未加载
评论 #7934708 未加载
lsiebert将近 11 年前
So, where can we get an invite?
badclient将近 11 年前
I&#x27;m amazed that Google did not buy godaddy when it was purchased by private equity.
评论 #7934803 未加载
marban将近 11 年前
Your move, Amazon.
sogen将近 11 年前
wow, first Google&#x27;s phone support
评论 #7934136 未加载
评论 #7934176 未加载
评论 #7934849 未加载
评论 #7934011 未加载
2close4comfort将近 11 年前
Ahhhhh...its invite only what gives?
fourstar将近 11 年前
Once again, Google trying to consolidate all the eggs into a single basket.
dota168将近 11 年前
Invite-only beta....<p>watch the hype fade away in a week and everyone will forget this exists (hello Google+)
评论 #7934322 未加载
评论 #7934127 未加载