No, not another follower of "things are difficult, let's make them simple, modern and nice" camp. Will people learn that removing stuff from the product doesn't make it simple, but simplistic? Removing features (changing languages, wikimedia/wikiquote links) is not an improvement.<p>Sure, the font typeface is nice, and much better than original but that's about it.<p>Why is the text so damn huge? I know how to use zoom, thank you very much. Actually, you even broke that - take a look at timeline image of <a href="http://wikipedia.moesalih.com/Hanibal" rel="nofollow">http://wikipedia.moesalih.com/Hanibal</a> - the picture text is a tiny compared to the gigantic text - I can zoom in, but then the text becomes even bigger.<p>A lot of whitespace and removing virtually all the colors makes the page look very sterile. Remove scrollbar, make the links indistinguishable from text and you have a Metro/Modern(R)(TM) app. I still wonder how much brain damage the designer of that style suffers from...<p>No visited link indication? Is that meant to be some kind of a joke?<p>Obviously in some designers' minds (including yours) cleaner = better. But it's not! Wikipedia is not the award-winning oh-my-god-it-looks-so-nice page. No it's very very functional and easy to read. All those vertical lines, boxes and bars add structure and visual cues to the text and make it much easier to read. Thank you for taking it away.<p>No offense, but this creation is horrible.