TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

A list of search results omitted due to the “Right to be forgotten”

158 点作者 afaqurk将近 11 年前

15 条评论

hosay123将近 11 年前
Perhaps the list would be more representative if it included at least a few victims of sexual exploitation, or teenagers who previously had trouble getting naked images of themselves removed from servers hosted outside the EU. Ideally it would also include a link to every child porn web site on the IWF&#x27;s blacklist, as used by at least the UK.<p>The problem with simply listing known cases where the &quot;censorship&quot; mechanism has some inefficiencies is that it hides the many cases where it can have a very real benefit to peoples&#x27; lives. The current implementation of the EU ruling leaves a lot to be desired, but let&#x27;s not challenge its intent - restoring an element of privacy and security that search engines have been strip mining for their own benefit for over a decade.
评论 #7994857 未加载
评论 #7994685 未加载
评论 #7994765 未加载
评论 #7994935 未加载
评论 #7995480 未加载
评论 #7994769 未加载
评论 #7994688 未加载
评论 #7996362 未加载
评论 #7994767 未加载
评论 #7994714 未加载
评论 #7996347 未加载
评论 #7994936 未加载
userbinator将近 11 年前
This reminds me that sometimes search results will have &quot;results were removed from this page due to DMCA complaint, click here to view it&quot; and then you can go through and see the whole list of URLs that were removed... and they&#x27;re often the torrent&#x2F;warez sites with the real pirated content, so it&#x27;s almost like they added a &quot;pirate mode&quot; filter. (I don&#x27;t pirate anything these days, so I don&#x27;t need it, but still a little amusing that Google is basically taking the &quot;removed from search results&quot; rather literally.)
评论 #7995889 未加载
x1798DE将近 11 年前
I imagine this won&#x27;t be a popular opinion, but I don&#x27;t see why it is necessary for this site to populate the list using javascript when server-side scripting would suffice.<p>Maybe they&#x27;re trying to fool search bots so their site won&#x27;t get delisted? I&#x27;m fairly sure Google at least has a bot built on Chrome (or rather Chrome was built around their search bot) that executes JS just fine.<p>Unfortunately, all it does is make a site that doesn&#x27;t degrade well with scripting turned off.
buzzkills将近 11 年前
The Stan O&#x27;Neil one is incorrect. Google spokes persons was on BBC Radio the other day and stated that it was one of the commenters on the article that requested the removal.<p>Here I found a source: <a href="http://thenextweb.com/google/2014/07/04/google-takedown-requests/" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;thenextweb.com&#x2F;google&#x2F;2014&#x2F;07&#x2F;04&#x2F;google-takedown-requ...</a>
评论 #7994707 未加载
评论 #7995053 未加载
RexRollman将近 11 年前
Out of curiosity, how is Bing handling this same situation? It applies to them as well, correct?
评论 #7994737 未加载
评论 #7994849 未加载
chton将近 11 年前
This is going to unleash hell when it gets big enough to be near the top google search results. Not only will anybody googling somebody know what they did, they&#x27;ll know the person wanted it removed.<p>I wonder how long it will take for google to de-list the site.
评论 #7994680 未加载
krick将近 11 年前
So the moral is simple: in the 21th century you have <i>no</i> right to be forgotten. Not sure if it&#x27;s actually fine.
评论 #7994932 未加载
评论 #7995159 未加载
unhammer将近 11 年前
So now it&#x27;s a &quot;Right to a Streisand effect&quot;
givan将近 11 年前
Most of the things I see in the comments from the supporters of the law are selfish arguments, what if Joe couldn&#x27;t delete his ugly story from the past, everyone wants this tool, maybe they want to remove something in the future about themselves, it might come in handy, they want it so badly that they are willing to sacrifice freedom of speech, maybe Joe should be more careful instead of trying to bury what he did to get away because Joe might become someone important and we should know things that otherwise will get buried.
maccard将近 11 年前
This page is almost 1MB downloaded, including 5 fonts, bootstrap, angular, and jquery. It does not need to be this complicated. My facebook homepage, including images, is smaller than this site.
fragsworth将近 11 年前
So if this list is published, won&#x27;t this have kind of a Streisand effect for people who request to be removed from Google search results?
kghose将近 11 年前
Let&#x27;s face it, this is simply an attempt to make it harder for Google to operate in the EU. It&#x27;s probably mainly normal bureaucratic nonsense, encouraged along by some nationalism and probably a bit from european corporations hoping to gain some market share away.
known将近 11 年前
Google&#x27;s search removal request URL under European Data Protection law.<p><a href="https://support.google.com/legal/contact/lr_eudpa?product=websearch#" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;support.google.com&#x2F;legal&#x2F;contact&#x2F;lr_eudpa?product=we...</a>
known将近 11 年前
Netcraft Risk Rating is 10&#x2F;10 <a href="http://toolbar.netcraft.com/site_report?url=http://hiddenfromgoogle.com" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;toolbar.netcraft.com&#x2F;site_report?url=http:&#x2F;&#x2F;hiddenfro...</a>
评论 #7994981 未加载
itamarhaber将近 11 年前
LOL - so now google.com + hiddenfromgoogle.com == the entire internets!
评论 #7994692 未加载