TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Are you living in a computer simulation?

23 点作者 henryl超过 15 年前

9 条评论

haseman超过 15 年前
A modern rehash of René Descartes's "I think therefore I am" problem. He asked, essentially, am I living a fantasy dreamed up for me by a "great deceiver". Replace "great deceiver" with "computer simulation" and the argument plays out the same way (albeit, with more probability in the modern case)<p>Ultimately, your existence is exactly what you perceive it to be. Speculating on the nature of our existence, on this level, is indicative of those who don't have to pay their own rent :-) You can chase your own tail on this one literally forever. As we cannot access the simulation we are running in (just as you can't really think about thinking) this idea becomes a debate on par with the existence of God. It cannot be proven one way or another.<p>All this aside, I'll admit it was a fun read.
评论 #801233 未加载
评论 #801210 未加载
michael_nielsen超过 15 年前
I suspect that the best response to this question is not yes or no, but rather "Who cares?"<p>It's in a similar class to "Can you prove that the Universe wasn't created by an invisible pink unicorn?" Well, no, I can't. But when I go to my grave, this inadequacy won't be at the top of my list of concerns.
评论 #801173 未加载
评论 #801227 未加载
param超过 15 年前
Quote from the introduction (<i>emphasis</i> mine) " Then it <i>could be the case</i> that the vast majority of minds like ours do not belong to the original race but rather to people simulated by the advanced descendants of an original race. <i>It is then possible to argue that</i>, if this were the case, we would be rational to think that <i>we are likely</i> among the simulated minds rather than among the original biological ones. Therefore, if we don’t think that we are currently living in a computer simulation, <i>we are not entitled to believe</i> that we will have descendants who will run lots of such simulations of their forebears. That is the basic idea. The rest of this paper will spell it out more carefully "<p>To distill the above: It is possible that some people are simulations. Therefore it is likely we are simulations. Therefore if we don't think we are simulations, we are not entitled to believe our descendants will run simulations of people.<p>Not sure if I even need to critique the logic behind that.
PebblesRox超过 15 年前
I love to watch my Sims playing the Sims on their little computers :)
blhack超过 15 年前
Reading a few of the comment here...<p>I feel bad for some of you. This isn't serious (at least I hope not), this is the sort of thing you get to toy around with in your head when you're driving on a long road trip or coming home from a long day at work.<p>It's <i>fun</i> to think about this sort of thing (for me and, aparently, a few others at least...)...the way some of your are commenting on this makes me feel like you would be the type of people to ask<p>"Why? Are we going somewhere?"<p>of an invitation to go for a walk.
run4yourlives超过 15 年前
No, you're living in my simulation.<p>Prove me wrong.<p>Obligatory: <a href="http://destructionoverdrive.blogspot.com/2005/06/last-answer-by-isaac-asimov.html" rel="nofollow">http://destructionoverdrive.blogspot.com/2005/06/last-answer...</a>
gtt超过 15 年前
People's stupidity is infinite and therefore it can't be simuleted.<p>On a serious note, even if we are in simulation we are still part of the real world just like many computer programms today.
DanielBMarkham超过 15 年前
Yes
lurkinggrue超过 15 年前
No.
评论 #801162 未加载