TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

ESA confirms Podkletnov's Anti-Gravity Effect (2006)

53 点作者 Mitt将近 11 年前

6 条评论

dalke将近 11 年前
According to <a href="http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=13020.1575" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;forum.nasaspaceflight.com&#x2F;index.php?topic=13020.1575</a> &quot;Martin Tajmar retracts 2006 claims of gravitomagnetic version of frame-dragging as noise&quot; in the publication at <a href="http://iopscience.iop.org/0953-2048/24/12/125011" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;iopscience.iop.org&#x2F;0953-2048&#x2F;24&#x2F;12&#x2F;125011</a> , Supercond. Sci. Technol. (2011) 24.<p>Tajmar is one of the researchers in that 2006 ESA project.
评论 #8063481 未加载
rurban将近 11 年前
This was 2006, but couldn&#x27;t be reproduced by others so far.<p>I would consider this quantum gravity research by far more important and cheaper than the CERN experiments which got us the mass of the Higgs boson. So far only Podkletnov, Tajmar and de Matos worked on this.<p>Goff and Siegel 2004 on FTL &quot;Faster Than Light&quot;: “Current warp drive investigations [Goldin and Svetlicny, 1994] apply general relativity to try to produce spacetime curvature that propagates at superlight speeds. Special relativity is preserved inside the warp field, but the contents are perceived to move at FTL speeds from the external frames. Such a classical warp drive cannot avoid the temporal paradox (i.e, time travel). If quantum systems are the only system that permits backward-in-time causality without temporal paradox, then any rational warp drive will need to be based on quantum principles. This means that until we have a workable theory of quantum gravity; research into warp drives based on General Relativity is probably doomed to failure.”
gus_massa将近 11 年前
&gt; <i>The results were presented at a one-day conference at ESA&#x27;s European Space and Technology Research Centre (ESTEC), in the Netherlands, 21 March 2006.</i><p>It&#x27;s not clear that this result was later published in a peer reviewed journal. The Wikipedia page about Eugene_Podkletnov ( <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eugene_Podkletnov" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Eugene_Podkletnov</a> ) don&#x27;t mention this work, and says that all this research field is very &quot;controversial&quot;.
评论 #8060867 未加载
ejr将近 11 年前
I&#x27;m cautiously optimistic, but let&#x27;s be a bit more reserved on this until we see it properly peer reviewed. This area is ripe for pathological science and a myriad errors induced by human factors.<p>Hopefully other labs around the world will be able to duplicate the experiment soon. We&#x27;ll see if the results are as well.
评论 #8060737 未加载
guard-of-terra将近 11 年前
&quot;could help physicists to make a significant step towards the long-sought-after quantum theory of gravity.&quot;<p>Could they also make a significant step towards the long-sought-after antigrav drive?<p>&quot;Dear scientists, I sincerely respect your hard work but WHERE IS THE TELEPORTER YET?&quot;
araes将近 11 年前
Congratulations! You&#x27;ve discovered Gravitonics. &quot;What goes up, better damn well stay up!&quot;<p>Would you like to research?<p>- Anti-gravity<p>- Space Manipulation
评论 #8061686 未加载