TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

The future of warfare

32 点作者 rberger将近 11 年前

6 条评论

Mithaldu将近 11 年前
&gt; sentient robots<p>Stopped reading there. There may be some kernel of truth in there, but trying to get it from a writer with literally zero integrity is pointless.
评论 #8062150 未加载
评论 #8061967 未加载
评论 #8062284 未加载
JVIDEL将近 11 年前
Sentient != autonomous, ie: the future are drones with that can receive orders and act on them rather than needing commands in real-time from an operator far away.<p>Of course talking about sentient machines with a terminator pic is much more <i>clickbaity</i>...
richliss将近 11 年前
The first nation to achieve accurate mobile laser defenses with rapid firing that could shoot down ICBM&#x27;s could take out the primary weapons of all of its enemies (and even friends).<p>Chances are that its going to be the US.<p>Should the US decide that China is going to be too powerful eventually then they could create some false flag events, possibly involving a regional ally such as Japan, that would give the US this power:<p>1. Nuke the entire country without reply. Not likely.<p>2. Force the Chinese government to scrap all nuclear weapons. Likely.<p>3. Force the Chinese government to not have a large standing army. Likely.<p>4. Force elections. Likely.<p>Now rinse and repeat for Russia and anyone else.<p>Every other nation would be forced to sign a treaty to not pursue laser weapons.<p>Many countries would have to force their local populations to disarm.<p>Now add in drones and you&#x27;ve got the US then able to continuously monitor and fly weapons of war over other sovereign states to &quot;keep the peace&quot;. No need for land based robots when a drone in the sky could fire a laser instantly killing someone as soon as they show a gun.<p>That&#x27;s what I call complete dominance and control.
评论 #8063136 未加载
评论 #8063054 未加载
beloch将近 11 年前
Eventually, two forces with these military golems will turn them on each other, either in a bid for supremacy or simply to evaluate their effectiveness and inform the designers of the next generation of golems. What kind of collateral damage will result from these automated clashes? Will both sides agree to keep their golems confined to a predetermined and uninhabited area of conflict, or will golem battles spill over into populated areas? Will weapons currently considered off limits for use against humans (e.g. tactical nukes, cluster bombs, and landmines) become palatable for use against golems? Will invading golems use civilians and infrastructure as cover? How will defending golems respond to this, or even determine that it has happened?<p>If a computer lets you make more mistakes faster than any other invention with the possible exceptions of handguns and tequila, why give a computer an automatic rifle and a rocket launcher?
评论 #8062105 未加载
johngalt将近 11 年前
What possible autonomous system could be worse than a battery of ICBMs?
评论 #8062333 未加载
评论 #8062279 未加载
评论 #8062271 未加载
评论 #8062340 未加载
评论 #8062448 未加载
btbuildem将近 11 年前
Lem covered this a long time ago: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peace_on_Earth_(novel)" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Peace_on_Earth_(novel)</a>