This article smells weird. First, what is Forbes' bias in this - what skin do they have in the game? Second, this line:
<i>All users, including Snowden, should be wary of using Tails with a false sense of security, though it’s still more likely to protect anonymity than Windows</i> comes only in the final paragraph. TAILS has zero-days - but Windows is still worse, eh? Why not mention that in the headline?<p>This smells like a PR Hit for some TLA.