TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Solar Roadways Awarded DOT Contract to Pave Roads with Solar Cells

6 点作者 auferstehung超过 15 年前

2 条评论

LeBleu超过 15 年前
$6,900 per panel adds up to about $3 million per lane-mile.<p>Typical rural highway costs for new highway are $3 - $9 million per lane-mile, with urban highways costing $5 - $20 million per lane-mile. (per <a href="http://www.railstotrails.org/resources/documents/whatwedo/policy/07-29-2008%20Generic%20Response%20to%20Cost%20per%20Lane%20Mile%20for%20widening%20and%20new%20construction.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.railstotrails.org/resources/documents/whatwedo/po...</a>)<p>The estimated 7.6 kwh per day per panel mentioned in the article, if you assume it gets that every day, adds up to 3.344 mwh per lane-mile, which at average US retail electric rates, adds up to $120,000 per lane-mile per year. According to their website, these panels will supposedly be designed to last 21 years, vs. the 7 typical for asphalt roadways. That would bring the lifetime electricity production per lane-mile up to $2.5 million. (not accounting for inflation nor electric price changes over 21 years)<p>Frankly, I find their 21 year projected life absurd, but then again I live in a state with yearly freeze-thaw cycles shortening the life of roadways. Other than that, it seems like if they could meet their claims, it would be financially feasible to build roads using this stuff.
ernop超过 15 年前
Do we have a lack of unused space, which isn't crossed every day by tons of heavy cars? If we're going to build these panels, there's no need to build them in distant places that often get damaged, like highways - better put them in unused land near a city to minimize power transportation costs.