While I acknowledge the author's opening statement, I still need to add a few details and refinements. :P<p>In addition to what the author describes for LOS guidance, there are a couple other, related guidance mechanisms. One is known as semi-active radar guidance. This scheme, used in early radar-guided air-to-air missiles, has the launcher illuminate the target with a special fire control waveform. The missile has a receiver in the nose that uses the reflection of this signal to correct its course. This arrangement still requires cooperation between the missile and the launcher, but the launcher does not need to track or communicate with the missile. The general scheme is known as bistatic radar.<p>The second, known as semi active radar homing with terminal guidance, is related. Most of the interception runs as described above. However, when the missile enters the terminal phase it switches to an onboard, short range seeker. This seeker is either a short range radar or some sort of IR device. At this point the launcher is out of the control loop.<p>Also, the section about proximity fuzing: cruise missiles <i>are</i> intended to physically hit their target with a high explosive warhead. In fact, the missile launch pictured in that section is an RGM-84 Harpoon, which is such a missile. Also a nit, but most anti-tank missiles (which I assume is what the author is talking about in the last paragraph of the section) aren't kinetic penetrators. They use special high explosive (HEAT) warheads.