TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Apache considered harmful

2 点作者 jm3将近 11 年前

1 comment

ncw33将近 11 年前
I have to say, without knowing any people involved with Apache, hindering projects from moving to git for any reason is hard to fathom. Why _wouldn&#x27;t_ a new project use git? In the old days of subversion, anyone wanting to commit to a project had to send in patch files, and only the project&#x27;s maintainers were allowed the luxury of saving their work each day in a convenient fashion by committing it on a branch.<p>To the younger generation, not using git for a new project (or similar VCS) can look like you don&#x27;t want outsiders to contribute. If older bodies and projects don&#x27;t recognise that, they risk not getting patches sent in. The difference between forking and making a pull request, rather than working out how to format a patch file according the mailing list&#x27;s conventions, is the difference between becoming a contributor, or not bothering.