TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

As Data Overflows Online, Researchers Grapple With Ethics

16 点作者 dalek2point3将近 11 年前

3 条评论

walterbell将近 11 年前
July 2014 conversation on &quot;social audits&quot; of algorithms, at Harvard&#x27;s Berkman Center: <a href="http://civic.mit.edu/blog/natematias/uncovering-algorithms-looking-inside-the-facebook-news-feed" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;civic.mit.edu&#x2F;blog&#x2F;natematias&#x2F;uncovering-algorithms-l...</a><p>Edit: Historical visions of the boundaries between emerging science and ethics: <i>Some Thoughts on Ethics and Science Fiction</i>, <a href="http://spectacle.org/396/scifi/pavlac.html" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;spectacle.org&#x2F;396&#x2F;scifi&#x2F;pavlac.html</a>
kylelibra将近 11 年前
Professor Hancock who authored the study has his PhD according to his faculty info on Cornell&#x27;s web site: <a href="http://infosci.cornell.edu/faculty/jeffrey-hancock" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;infosci.cornell.edu&#x2F;faculty&#x2F;jeffrey-hancock</a><p>Why does the article keep referring to him as Professor instead of Doctor?
评论 #8171408 未加载
dwaltrip将近 11 年前
<i>While some would say the risks of the Facebook study were obvious, Professor Hancock said the researchers did not realize that manipulating the news feed, even modestly, would make some people feel violated.</i><p>I have to call bullshit on this. The whole point of the study was to see how their emotional state would be affected. Prior to this, no one would have expected to be &quot;experimented&quot; on while using a consumer web product.
评论 #8171525 未加载