Reading the title, I was expecting to reply "python -m SimpleHTTPServer", but it actually looks like a nice app with some useful features.<p>Would prefer ngrok over localtunnel, but hey, it's open source. Guess I'll do it myself!
Nice simple, easy to use and <i>focussed on the core task</i>, not an accidental byproduct of another product/tool/language. So gets my +1<p>Of course there are many options to do the same thing - but this is a simple, clean and elegant start to a potentially really nice tool.
It does look like a nice app. Any comments on security? Anytime I see a windows web server I worry a bit about about that, only based on what I've seen in the past.<p>The fact that it has a nice GUI makes adoption much more likely, going to play with this tonight :)<p>Edit: <a href="https://yvrwzxiyog.localtunnel.me" rel="nofollow">https://yvrwzxiyog.localtunnel.me</a> Cool!
I am really surprised that anyone would need this, but it definitely doesn't hurt. From what I can see, it serves static sites only. I... kind of... never needed that.<p>It looks good though.
This would be perfect with one feature: reverse proxy (. It would be perfect to be able to put this in front of Django. I agree, Apache is annoying for one's desktop.
Looks interesting GUI but I much prefer to use Flask for simple needs. Flask has replaced Node.js completely, although I do miss the async, it's not worth wrestling with Javascript for in my experience.<p><pre><code> python server.py
Running on http://127.0.0.1:5000</code></pre>