TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Make pull requests easier

15 点作者 mlakewood将近 11 年前

8 条评论

fragmede将近 11 年前
A bit too lean of an &#x27;mvp&#x27; for me.<p>The pull-request box looks like a live-demo, so I dug up a URL only to find out it&#x27;s not :&#x2F;<p>A bit of a nit-pick, but if there&#x27;s only 1 field, I don&#x27;t need to be told it&#x27;s required - the &#x27;* required&#x27; on the singular email field seems redundant. (I understand it&#x27;s probably the framework you&#x27;re using, but it just seems weird.)<p>You only screen shot doesn&#x27;t show: does your side-by-side diffs support coloring? eg. <a href="https://confluence.atlassian.com/download/attachments/298976810/Crucible_2.2-Side-by-Side-Diff_Main-View-RAW-70.png" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;confluence.atlassian.com&#x2F;download&#x2F;attachments&#x2F;298976...</a>
评论 #8187436 未加载
jtfairbank将近 11 年前
I manage a number of student projects at the University of Illinois. I can integrate Indifference into our current code review process if you need an early test group. We currently use Github pull requests. My email for the signup list is similar to my HN handle, jtfairbank.<p>Feature requests:<p>* A signoff list of people who&#x27;ve reviewed the pull request and feel its ready to accept. This&#x27;d be helpful as most of our work is independent &#x2F; &#x27;remote&#x27; (we&#x27;re not all in the same room together).<p>* Works on most platforms, or is web based. Each student has their own personal setup that we need to accomodate.<p>* The ability for a Pull Request submitter to link to other resources, such as documentation, Trello cards, various Github features (code files and issues come to mind)... Basically, it&#x27;d be nice for the submitter to provide a short description of how their changes affect the software at a high level. I find most of this exists in our other documentation. Currently we just add a description with the links to the PR description on Github, but maybe you can improve on that.
评论 #8187930 未加载
igetspam将近 11 年前
Thank you for forcing email validation in your sign up page. I get a lot of spam because so few do.<p>What &quot;desktop&quot; is your target? Someone recently asked me if I knew a good side-by-side diff tool that worked with GitHub and wasn&#x27;t written a decade ago. I only knew of a buggy plugin. This, superficially, seems to be what he was looking for. If your target is Apple, he&#x27;d likely be thrilled. If it&#x27;s Linux, I&#x27;d be interested.
评论 #8186990 未加载
orf将近 11 年前
Looks good, the landing page could be a bit clearer - some more screenshots would be good. At the moment all the images just look like GitHub screenshots.
评论 #8186866 未加载
justinlilly将近 11 年前
What I&#x27;ve gotten from this is that you&#x27;re shipping side-by-side diffs that are &#x27;better&#x27;, but it&#x27;s unclear what it&#x27;s better &#x2F;than&#x2F;. Inline diffs? Some other tool&#x27;s side-by-side diffing?<p>I want to know more about &quot;better navigation&quot; and context.<p>I would love, love, love to talk with you about this. justin@abrah.ms Seriously.
评论 #8186980 未加载
mmohebbi将近 11 年前
Gitcritic does some of this right now as a webapp, including side-by-side diffs:<p><a href="http://gitcritic.com" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;gitcritic.com</a><p><a href="https://github.com/danvk/better-pull-requests" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;danvk&#x2F;better-pull-requests</a>
评论 #8188613 未加载
mlakewood将近 11 年前
Reviewing pull requests in github with the inline diff is a pain. You also don&#x27;t get enough context to do a correct review. This app is a way to fix that.<p>At this point I want to validate the idea. If you&#x27;re interested in this please leave your email address. or a comment below. Any feedback would be great!
matthewbauer将近 11 年前
Is this meant for projects that aren&#x27;t using Github?
评论 #8188345 未加载