TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Two Countries, Two Vastly Different Phone Bills

49 点作者 fideloper将近 11 年前

11 条评论

petercooper将近 11 年前
Three is awesome. I actually tether through my phone at work because getting ~10Mbps to myself over 3G beats sharing a 10Mbps leased line amongst about 20 offices. I always have YouTube or Twitch on in the background, etc, and never run into any problems. I pay something like £20 a month.<p>To balance though, historically Internet access options were not good.. I was on dialup until about 2003, and then pretty horrific 1Mbps DSL until at least 2009 or so. The UK has done a great job at catching up somehow.
评论 #8219628 未加载
Falkon1313将近 11 年前
I&#x27;ve always gone with the no-contract plans. I pay $35&#x2F;month for the same phone and unlimited service that one of my family members is paying $100&#x2F;month for. Really I don&#x27;t see the point of the contract plans.
评论 #8219648 未加载
评论 #8219517 未加载
评论 #8221414 未加载
chrismeller将近 11 年前
I would think that one of the &quot;several factors involved&quot; may dwarf regulation: area.<p>The UK operators have 94,000 square miles to cover while US operators have a little over 3.1 million, just in the lower 48. Obviously no single carrier is ever going to cover 100% of either country (and in the US in in particular they don&#x27;t come even close), but the simple size of the problem in the US drives their infrastructure costs way up.<p>If AT&amp;T only had to cover the state of Michigan (96,000 square miles) they could probably do it for less than $60 a month...<p>I agree that we don&#x27;t have nearly enough competition in the US, but let&#x27;s not pretend that a few more &quot;harmless&quot; laws will make everything rosy and perfect.
评论 #8219538 未加载
评论 #8219587 未加载
评论 #8219548 未加载
abritishguy将近 11 年前
I&#x27;ve always found it funny that it is cheaper to use my UK monthly rolling contract in America (free roaming yay) than it is to have an American contract - completely bizarre.
评论 #8219448 未加载
abritishguy将近 11 年前
I would like to point out that the following part of the article is not true (she was probably getting confused with broadband):<p>&quot;Britain has forced companies to lease their networks to competitors at cost&quot;
评论 #8219800 未加载
ksec将近 11 年前
Britain has forced companies to lease their networks to competitors at cost?<p>So anyone could just enter the market?
评论 #8219490 未加载
评论 #8219360 未加载
评论 #8219659 未加载
评论 #8219171 未加载
评论 #8219455 未加载
评论 #8219353 未加载
评论 #8219449 未加载
kleiba将近 11 年前
Just curious, but is it possible to give the costs for comparable contracts in other countries, too?
评论 #8219608 未加载
评论 #8219542 未加载
评论 #8219591 未加载
__xtrimsky将近 11 年前
I pay 45$ &#x2F; month for everything unlimited with Straight Talk (uses AT&amp;T&#x27;s coverage).<p>And my wife pays 30$ for 100 minutes, unlimited text and 5GB data with T-Mobile.<p>even 67$ I find that pretty expensive.
评论 #8220385 未加载
anemitz将近 11 年前
It&#x27;s worth noting that the billing methods for US and the rest of Europe are very different when it comes to voice. For instance, it costs between 4c&#x2F;min to 26c&#x2F;min to call a UK mobile phone. In the US it&#x27;s &lt; 1c&#x2F;min. Outside the US, the caller of a mobile phone is generally the party footing the bill for the entire call.<p>The more interesting question I have is why would it cost 26c&#x2F;min to call a mobile phone? And since each carrier prefix may have a different cost, how do consumers keep all these prefixes &#x2F; carrier rates straight in their heads?<p>Edit: I&#x27;m looking at flowroute, plivo, and twilio.
评论 #8219692 未加载
评论 #8219704 未加载
RichardFord将近 11 年前
I pay about $75 for 2 gigabytes from Verizon, so I don&#x27;t know where these numbers are coming from.
评论 #8219609 未加载
lostmsu将近 11 年前
FreedomPop