TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

The Satoshi Nakamoto Email Hacker Says He's Negotiating with the Bitcoin Founder

129 点作者 harwoodr超过 10 年前

20 条评论

DominikR超过 10 年前
I had a GMX account years ago that was hacked and my password was pretty hard. (I generate my passwords with Keypass)<p>I suspect that this is not Satoshis fault, but that GMX security is really bad.
评论 #8294675 未加载
评论 #8294476 未加载
评论 #8295783 未加载
评论 #8294072 未加载
评论 #8294241 未加载
kazinator超过 10 年前
Is there any proof that any of this is real?<p>Since we don&#x27;t know who Satoshi Nakamoto is, there is no way to prove whether identity theft occurred to this person.<p>Whoever has control of certain accounts <i>is</i>, for all intents and purposes, Satoshi Nakamoto.<p>Someone who jumps up and down claiming that <i>he</i> is the real Satoshi who has been locked out from those accounts and subject to extortion could be the real one, or could be a liar.<p>There is no way to know whether the incident took place at all, or if it did take place, which of the two people are the real one.<p>It could be a complete hoax perpetrated by a single person, or two people, any of whom may or may not be Satoshi Nakamoto. The real Satoshi Nakamoto could also be a group of people to begin with. Or a very clever dog.
评论 #8294223 未加载
评论 #8294161 未加载
danbruc超过 10 年前
If I gain access to such an account, I change the password to something that no one will ever break. Maybe besides the rightful owner by some account recovery mechanism I am unable to disable. But multiple people having access seems a very unlikely scenario to me. Why would you share the credentials (and risk getting locked out yourself)?
评论 #8293964 未加载
评论 #8295875 未加载
nly超过 10 年前
I think we&#x27;ve passed the point where even if the original Satoshi steps forward with a PGP signed autobiography nobody will believe it&#x27;s really him. We like our legends I guess.
评论 #8294257 未加载
评论 #8293555 未加载
评论 #8293491 未加载
评论 #8296166 未加载
Glyptodon超过 10 年前
GMX has pretty bad security policies, so it&#x27;s not that surprising to me that someone got access. Last I checked they didn&#x27;t even require HTTPS.
评论 #8293811 未加载
d0ugie超过 10 年前
What a degenerate display of &quot;hacking.&quot; Some man (or a group, whatever) gives the Internet something remarkable and a bit historic, but wishes to remain anonymous.<p>So instead of respecting that wish we have people like this, also wishing to remain anonymous, attempting to hunt this man to shake him down for payment using that man&#x27;s own creation!<p>That&#x27;s closer to repugnance than to irony in my book.
评论 #8296591 未加载
Jerry_Magie超过 10 年前
I&#x27;ve always thought that most people &quot;in the know&quot; know that Nick Szabo (well the guy going under that name) had something to do with bitcoin in it&#x27;s early days. If you read his blog from 1999 onward, I think you will come to the same conclusion. I think the whole &quot;who is Satoshi Nakamoto&quot; legend really masks a lot of the facts
moyix超过 10 年前
Assuming what&#x27;s in the article is true, I suppose it&#x27;s only a matter of time before a torrent of the mailbox shows up. I have to admit that if I had access to that account, I wouldn&#x27;t be able to resist the urge to clone it via POP3&#x2F;IMAP – it seems strange that if &quot;multiple people&quot; have access to it none of them have done this.
nickodell超过 10 年前
If you really found the identity of Satoshi, wouldn&#x27;t it make far more sense to contact him privately and blackmail him? He&#x27;s got, what, one and a half million bitcoins?
评论 #8294379 未加载
评论 #8294428 未加载
imaginenore超过 10 年前
It no longer really matters who Satoshi is. He doesn&#x27;t participate in Bitcoin development. He isn&#x27;t that wealthy, yet at least.<p>Nor his character assassination can affect Bitcoin much, while it could a few years ago. He was pretty smart staying anonymous, he realized he would be targeted and smeared.
评论 #8294466 未加载
评论 #8296851 未加载
tempestn超过 10 年前
As the article states, if this person had really wanted to profit, a far easier method would have been to use Satoshi&#x27;s identity to manipulate the price of Bitcoin. Either he didn&#x27;t, in fact, realize that opportunity (despite his claims), or he has other motives besides simply profiting from the hack. (Or something more complicated is going on.)
评论 #8294231 未加载
vitoreiji超过 10 年前
Skype? Sounds strange to me.
评论 #8293665 未加载
zcucumber超过 10 年前
So it&#x27;s the same guy who tried to extort Roger Ver?
jokoon超过 10 年前
why does that story matter ?<p>what is that &quot;hitman&quot; threat ?
swalsh超过 10 年前
dude could make way more money sending fake emails from the account as satoshi, creating a scandal and profiting.
kostaaaas超过 10 年前
if you work in the cardreaderfactory.com you can search for old receipts of 420$ and check the contact info ...
评论 #8296570 未加载
评论 #8295944 未加载
exit超过 10 年前
if this comes out would it prove that no government agency was behind the creation of bitcoin?
评论 #8295701 未加载
carsongross超过 10 年前
Why do I get the feeling that even if this guy gets what he wants, in the long run he&#x27;ll end up getting what he deserves?
l33tbro超过 10 年前
Do we know for sure that Satoshi actually had a GMX account?
评论 #8294066 未加载
评论 #8293539 未加载
评论 #8293480 未加载
knodi超过 10 年前
The thing is do you really want to play with fire??? Before the end of next week its very likely this story is going to have a tragic ending.