The problem of Soylent is the oversimplification and premise that our nutrition science has figured it all out (yes, the same science that was vilifying saturated fat, salt, alcohol, etc.). I can understand using Soylent as a meal replacement occasionally, but doing this regularly is too risky. I mean, people can definitely survive on it, but thrive - I don't think so. Also, every ingredient of it is poor quality. Canola oil vs olive oil, rice protein vs organic grass-fed whey concentrate, worst form of magnesium (oxide vs citrate/malate/glycinate/orotate), soy lecithin vs sunflower lecithin, vitamin d2 vs d3, etc. Every single ingredient is the cheapest form. Some are proven to be detrimental for health - alpha tocopherol vs mixed tocopherols and tocotrienols, vitamin A vs mixed carotenoids, folic acid vs folate, and so on. I won't even mention sucralose, artificial flavors, and the Chinese origin of some of the ingredients. Again, this is not biohacking, this is amateur hour.