TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Introducing //TODO for companies that are committed to open source

70 点作者 hswolff超过 10 年前

9 条评论

jamesgpearce超过 10 年前
Hey all, I&#x27;ve been part of pulling this initiative together and thought I&#x27;d just put together some of our early thoughts.<p>The primary purpose is to get the open source program managers from companies together. It turns out there are a bunch of challenges for companies who want to run open source projects effectively, and we discovered we had only rarely even shared our own experiences of doing so - let alone figured out how to improve things.<p>A roadmap for the group&#x27;s work is still to be defined... at this point you should consider this an invite to get involved. But we imagine some of the outputs might include things like:<p>- shared best practices for running large open source programs well<p>- certain criteria or qualities that &#x27;good&#x27; projects should aspire to (responsiveness to community, maintenance, test-coverage, clear licensing, etc)<p>- tooling &amp; instrumentation that makes it easier for companies to reach and maintain those standards<p>- a directory of projects from members that meet some or all of those criteria<p>I don&#x27;t want to imply that we&#x27;re committing to do all of these, but perhaps these non-normative examples give a bit more colour to the sort of things we&#x27;ll tackle.<p>If you&#x27;re at all interested, please sign up. We hope to have a face-to-face workshop very soon to kick off the work and understand what members want to prioritize.
评论 #8322382 未加载
boucher超过 10 年前
After reading this announcement, I have no clue what this is or why my company might want to join it.
评论 #8322131 未加载
评论 #8322145 未加载
评论 #8322170 未加载
评论 #8322153 未加载
评论 #8322144 未加载
评论 #8322136 未加载
amateurhuman超过 10 年前
Thanks for the comments everyone, hopefully I can answer some of the questions about what TODO is about and where it&#x27;s headed, don&#x27;t miss jamesgpearce&#x27;s comments too.<p>One of the first principles when forming the group was that we wanted to collaborate with, and learn from, each other before developing prescriptive guidelines. The ten member companies that launched with TODO are just a fraction of companies that have open source programs; there are companies in wide ranging industries like finance, automotive, and retail that have already expressed interest in participating too. So instead of launching today with our version of the answers, we wanted to invite dialogue and particiaption.<p>Many of the participating and interested companies have already written extensive documentation and internal tools to solve some of the unique challenges of their open source programs. We want to take that experience, find the common patterns, and open it up to the broader community.<p>We believe that the best practices, tooling, and development principles that will come from the group will improve the overall quality of the projects; that these projects can be adopted by other companies with certain expectations.<p>If these are the same problems you face in your company&#x27;s open source program, we&#x27;d love to hear from you and have you participate because you can help define the problems we tackle.
spb超过 10 年前
At first I thought this was going to be a tool that highlights &quot;&#x2F;&#x2F;TODO:&quot; comments in code for contributors to hack on in open-source projects.
评论 #8322215 未加载
评论 #8322916 未加载
arihant超过 10 年前
Okay I&#x27;m not sure this is well thought out, at least the sign on procedure is not. Here is a series of messages they present to the user:<p>1. It is for companies with dedicated resources for open source projects.<p>2. The person signing on has to mention the company he is with, so ideally a person from the &quot;dedicated resource&quot; or open source department of a prospective company?<p>3. They exist to discuss &quot;how to shift ownership of projects from companies to the community&quot;.<p>So as a person of an open source department at their company, one is expected to join this to help their company render their department useless?<p>They should bake it better and present it to the right person.
评论 #8322231 未加载
评论 #8322317 未加载
m0nastic超过 10 年前
James Pearce (Facebook Open Source Person commenting in here) gave a pretty interesting talk about Facebook&#x27;s internal Open Source process at OSCon: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fzL6Zoy_ndk&amp;list=UUP_lo1MFyx5IXDeD9s_6nUw" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=fzL6Zoy_ndk&amp;list=UUP_lo1MFyx5...</a><p>I think things like this are a good way to get companies more aligned with contributing to open source, even aside from the mammoth technology companies already involved. I know that for many companies, the decision not to open source parts of their software isn&#x27;t based on any idealogical disagreement with open source, but because their software projects haven&#x27;t been designed with open sourcing as a goal, and if they can now take that into account when starting new projects, I&#x27;d expect that you might see a lot more open source software. So I think an organization that helps foster that can provide a lot of benefit.<p>And I&#x27;m not even a big open source zealot, but the number of companies who &quot;get&quot; the fact that participating in open source can be useful for lots of reasons (many better than &quot;get the community to do work for free for us&quot;), could certainly stand to be higher.
zobzu超过 10 年前
Interestingly fully-open companies like mozilla aren&#x27;t in there
peterbraden超过 10 年前
&#x27;talking&#x27; isn&#x27;t really a problem that Open Source has. Funding on the other hand...
vhost-超过 10 年前
I&#x27;m surprised this came from Github considering there&#x27;s nothing even remotely parsable anywhere.<p>Maybe it&#x27;s my (legit) dyslexia, but I can&#x27;t understand what the hell this is.<p>Secondly, Walmart labs?
评论 #8322383 未加载