TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

After Long Delays, Breakthrough Nanopore Sequencer Finally in Labs

45 点作者 rberger超过 10 年前

10 条评论

waiquoo超过 10 年前
Researcher working on a different approach to nanopore sequencing here. The Minion is really interesting technology, but early reports basically indicate that it&#x27;s essentially useless in it&#x27;s current form. One of the issues is that the basecalling algorithm relies on a noisy, two bit signal. Apparently it works okay on trained sequences, like lambda DNA (that&#x27;s where the 60-85% accuracy comes from). But when used to sequence untrained DNA, the accuracy drops off significantly (&lt;10% accuracy, <a href="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1755-0998.12324/abstract" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;onlinelibrary.wiley.com&#x2F;doi&#x2F;10.1111&#x2F;1755-0998.12324&#x2F;a...</a>).<p>There is lot&#x27;s of room for improvement though. All of the commercial nanopore tech is based on biological nanopores, which have the advantage of having very straight-forward to fabricate. But they are limited to the ionic current signal, which is very noisy and weak. Once these companies start introducing solid-state devices though, things will begin to get very interesting as alternative signal transduction mechanisms come into play.
评论 #8330620 未加载
Sulfolobus超过 10 年前
There was recently an online mini-conference mostly about the MinIon (involving the CTO of Oxford Nanopore and a few of the researchers involved in the MinIon Access Program).<p>People may be specifically interested in the first and second talks with the corollary of both being likely biased towards the MinIon:<p>- 1st is by Clive Brown (ONP CTO) and discusses the MinIon platform, background to the Nanopore technology, analysis platforms and the future PromethIon expansions - <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&amp;v=UtXlr19xTh8#t=189" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?feature=player_detailpage&amp;v=Ut...</a><p>- 2nd has Nick Loman (one of the MAP researchers but admitted &#x27;fanboy&#x27;) discussing the performance on the MinIon in his lab in &#x27;real world&#x27; conditions - <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&amp;v=UtXlr19xTh8#t=2950" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?feature=player_detailpage&amp;v=Ut...</a>
jacquesm超过 10 年前
This is one of those examples where both patents and venture capital come out shining.<p>Incredible work, the stamina on display is extremely impressive and I hope they and their backers will reap the rewards from all the hard work very many times over.<p>To put in laymans terms what this thing is: it&#x27;s a tape-playback machine for DNA.<p>Now they need to fix the bugs (hard, but probably not nearly as hard as getting to this stage in the first place).
cliveowen超过 10 年前
Talk about serendipity, I was just reading this article from September 6th:<p><a href="http://www.economist.com/news/technology-quarterly/21615029-george-church-genetics-pioneer-whose-research-spans-treating-diseases-altering" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.economist.com&#x2F;news&#x2F;technology-quarterly&#x2F;21615029-...</a><p>&quot;One of these, Genia, is commercialising a process called nanopore sequencing that Dr Church first devised in 1988. Distinct polymer tags are attached to each of the four nucleotides poised to contribute to a single molecule of replicating DNA. As they react, the tags are released near a protein layer full of tiny holes called nanopores. Each tag blocks the flow of electrical ions across the layer in a different way. Because it relies on electronics rather than optics, nanopore sequencing promises faster, cheaper sequencing. Dr Church holds up a fingernail-sized chip containing 128,000 nanopores that he reckons will bring the cost of sequencing down to $100. In June, Genia was acquired by Roche, a Swiss pharmaceuticals giant.&quot;
Gatsky超过 10 年前
Not having to deal with all the complexities of analysing short read sequence data would be fantastic, I hope they get the accuracy a bit better. At the moment current sequencing technologies are great at detecting mutations but struggle with changes in gene number, gene fusions and large structural variation at the kilobase or more scale. Hopefully long read tech will open up this aspect of genomic information to greater scrutiny.<p>Having said that, for cancer genomics, the vast majority of archival tumour tissue in the world is stored in a way that auto-fragments the DNA, so being able to do long reads won&#x27;t actually help...
nhstanley超过 10 年前
Here is a critique of this system by an expert: <a href="http://omicsomics.blogspot.com.es/2014/09/reanalysis-lays-bare-minion-reviews.html" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;omicsomics.blogspot.com.es&#x2F;2014&#x2F;09&#x2F;reanalysis-lays-ba...</a><p>It&#x27;s a great achievement and I&#x27;m hopeful, but the accuracy needs to go up before it competes with current standard.
XorNot超过 10 年前
At $1000 a machine, if they can get the accuracy up these things are going to be <i>everywhere</i>. There&#x27;ll be absolutely no reason for any lab tangentially related to DNA not to have one.<p>Like that is not even a blip in a normal research budget for equipment.
lotsofmangos超过 10 年前
I like that it is called a Minion. Presumably there is a gene sequencer market for evil megalomaniacs who live under volcanoes.
mrfusion超过 10 年前
How do they get the DNA unwound and free from tangles? Isn&#x27;t it normally wrapped around his tones ?
评论 #8330098 未加载
mrfusion超过 10 年前
How do they pull the DNA through the pores? That just seems impossible to me.
评论 #8329811 未加载
评论 #8330025 未加载