TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Frame Pointer Optimization vs. degugging compiled code (2007)

13 点作者 yiransheng超过 10 年前

1 comment

gilgoomesh超过 10 年前
I have to use FPO in a few 32-bit builds that I make because some inline assembly that I didn&#x27;t write requires it (compiler runs out of registers without FPO). Working around this type of nuisance isn&#x27;t worth the hassle, just to let other people debug my release builds.<p>I think this article is ignoring the more important rule: always generate a debugging information file (PDB, DWARF, dSYM) for every release and hold onto that file indefinitely. Provided you have the relevant file, you can still &quot;symbolicate&quot; crash dumps and similar user reports.<p>Yes, in this case the vendor that wrote the driver might not be keen to share the debug information file but unless you&#x27;re supplying components to other people, you can use FPO without a problem provided you keep your debug information files.