TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Who wrote Linux Kernel 2.6.20?

91 点作者 vinutheraj超过 15 年前

5 条评论

old-gregg超过 15 年前
I've always been curious who are these people who commit so much personal time on open source projects (instead of doing rounded corners kind of web 2.0 work) and I googled Jeff Garzik, seemingly the most productive developer during this release:<p><a href="http://linux.yyz.us" rel="nofollow">http://linux.yyz.us</a><p>Notice that even his home page is all about his projects as opposed to self-promotion.<p>Compare that to the douchebag Seth Sternberg (<a href="http://bit.ly/1m9PTZ" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/1m9PTZ</a>), who built a company on top of libpurple's team open sourced work, bragged about building "from nothing to something" and <i>didn't even mention them</i> in TC article, preferring to speak about his "desire to build the next great thing" buillshit instead.
评论 #835639 未加载
评论 #835468 未加载
mwcremer超过 15 年前
From 2007. Try this:<p><a href="http://lwn.net/Articles/348445/" rel="nofollow">http://lwn.net/Articles/348445/</a>
评论 #835211 未加载
corbet超过 15 年前
2.6.20 is relatively old, of course; I've done this research for every subsequent kernel as well. If you go to the LWN kernel index (<a href="http://lwn.net/Kernel/Index/" rel="nofollow">http://lwn.net/Kernel/Index/</a>) and look under "releases", you'll find the stats for each kernel release.<p>There's a longer-term version of this research available from the front page of the Linux Foundation's site as well.
robk超过 15 年前
It's disappointing that Google isn't more prominent on that list given their dependence on open source in so many places and having acquired such deep talent over the years.
评论 #835763 未加载
评论 #835610 未加载
评论 #835384 未加载
评论 #835352 未加载
评论 #835718 未加载
评论 #835291 未加载
rams超过 15 年前
Related, "Linux Kernel Development Stats from Greg Kroah Hartman": <a href="http://bit.ly/1rutJD" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/1rutJD</a>