TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Google Wi-Fi Roundup Has Lawyers Chasing Landmark Jackpot

30 点作者 MyDogHasFleas超过 10 年前

4 条评论

ChrisAntaki超过 10 年前
My understanding is that Google was really upfront about apologizing &amp; explaining the mistake [1]. People see money signs though...<p>[1] <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2010/may/15/google-admits-storing-private-data" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.theguardian.com&#x2F;technology&#x2F;2010&#x2F;may&#x2F;15&#x2F;google-adm...</a>
评论 #8365443 未加载
评论 #8365773 未加载
评论 #8366527 未加载
评论 #8365885 未加载
评论 #8365398 未加载
cornewut超过 10 年前
If it&#x27;s ok to collect electromagnetic emissions in range from 430 to 790 THz [<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Visible_spectrum" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Visible_spectrum</a>], why it shouldn&#x27;t be the same for 2.4 GHz?
评论 #8367017 未加载
评论 #8365886 未加载
zaroth超过 10 年前
What a bizarre process. So if these 22 people can&#x27;t find their MAC in the .pcap then it&#x27;s case closed? What if they weren&#x27;t home at the time, and it&#x27;s just beacons? So only if they happened to be streaming a video from Netflix at the time, causing enough continuous traffic load so that some actual L3 packets pop up in the scan, only then do we get to squeeze some billions from Larry and Sergey?<p>Don&#x27;t get me wrong, I really like the idea of sending a strong signal to companies that driving a van up to my house and pcap&#x27;ing my packets is not acceptable. But I do hope it&#x27;s proportionate. $1 per byte sounds about right, so 200GB = $200B. Don&#x27;t worry, we can let them pay over 100 years. Oh wait, there&#x27;s already a name for that. Taxes.<p>At least this will set a great precedent for suing the NSA next, right?
评论 #8366230 未加载
iamshs超过 10 年前
But, Google did mine Wi-Fi data of a lot of people, so why do only those 22 people are to be proven as victim. Can&#x27;t the case be broadened?
评论 #8365724 未加载
评论 #8365951 未加载