TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

An Experiment That Changed How We Think About Reality

58 点作者 aatish超过 10 年前

6 条评论

slacka超过 10 年前
How does this relate to Wired&#x27;s other article on the pilot wave explanation of quantum mechanics?[1]<p>&quot;To some researchers, the experiments suggest that quantum objects are as definite as droplets, and that they too are guided by pilot waves — in this case, fluid-like undulations in space and time. These arguments have injected new life into a deterministic (as opposed to probabilistic) theory of the microscopic world first proposed, and rejected, at the birth of quantum mechanics.&quot;<p>[1] <a href="http://www.wired.com/2014/06/the-new-quantum-reality/" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.wired.com&#x2F;2014&#x2F;06&#x2F;the-new-quantum-reality&#x2F;</a>
评论 #8379313 未加载
mehwoot超过 10 年前
This is very confusing. &quot;But according to quantum mechanics, the answer is 50%&quot;. How is this so? The article doesn&#x27;t mention how quantum mechanics explains what is going on, just that &quot;classical physics&quot; doesn&#x27;t.
评论 #8378944 未加载
Cookingboy超过 10 年前
In Brian Greene&#x27;s book &quot;Fabrics of the Universe&quot; he also mentioned some other experiments that completely shattered our understanding of reality. One such was the quantum eraser and especially delayed choice quantum eraser, which COULD mean causality can be violated.<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_eraser_experiment" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Quantum_eraser_experiment</a><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delayed_choice_quantum_eraser" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Delayed_choice_quantum_eraser</a>
评论 #8379430 未加载
lifeformed超过 10 年前
Why do the 3-color passport stamps have to be distributed normally? If some patterns were more common than others, than couldn&#x27;t it explain the 55.55%?
评论 #8378952 未加载
sriku超过 10 年前
There is a gem of a book recommended at the bottom of the article - &quot;boojums all the way through&quot;.
cowpig超过 10 年前
Is it possible that the 3-door box is not doing the same thing as the 1-door box? By this I mean that the 1-door box is measuring some hidden variable that the 3-door box is not measuring?