TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Mozilla Brick

367 点作者 _kushagra超过 10 年前

22 条评论

ngokevin超过 10 年前
The things that deters me about Brick are that there aren&#x27;t very many components yet, they aren&#x27;t very styled or pretty, and the site doesn&#x27;t show me what the components look like on one page (I have to click through to a demo for each component). It&#x27;s only been around for a year, though honestly with the support it has gotten, I&#x27;d need to see more before I&#x27;m able to imagine developers using it. Obviously, it&#x27;s a beautiful concept.<p>I like Ionic&#x27;s, which is the most fully fleshed out set of UI components I&#x27;ve seen. Though it&#x27;s not as modular as Brick, I&#x27;d rather have a complete monolithic set of components rather than sparse modular ones: <a href="http://ionicframework.com/docs/components/" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;ionicframework.com&#x2F;docs&#x2F;components&#x2F;</a><p>The site does throw some errors, which leads me to believe this wasn&#x27;t meant to be shared yet. Although, Brick has done the &quot;HN launch&quot; already in the past.
评论 #8387096 未加载
nanoscopic超过 10 年前
I clicked through all of the examples, and I would never use any of these components. They are very plain, they don&#x27;t provide much functionality, and the functionality they provide is lackluster ( unappealing ).<p>As others here have stated, I also couldn&#x27;t tell if some of the examples are even working or not; they are that bad.<p>If you are looking for a fine set of interworking components that provide a refined look and feel along with nice examples of the options provided; then you&#x27;ll probably want to look at one of the other 30 or so UI widget sets.
评论 #8388743 未加载
评论 #8388386 未加载
评论 #8389056 未加载
评论 #8389037 未加载
qewrffewqwfqew超过 10 年前
wth is going on at mozilla? There seems to be a lot of excitement to create stuff, without much attention to whether it&#x27;s needed .. or where the lifecycle goes beyond creation.<p><a href="http://www.ianbicking.org/blog/2014/09/professional-transitions.html" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.ianbicking.org&#x2F;blog&#x2F;2014&#x2F;09&#x2F;professional-transiti...</a>
评论 #8387202 未加载
评论 #8387182 未加载
评论 #8388762 未加载
general_failure超过 10 年前
The demos seems very unpolished but I hope they keep working on it.<p>Does anyone know what framework is used to &#x27;generate&#x27; such doc websites? <a href="http://brick.mozilla.io/v2.0/docs" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;brick.mozilla.io&#x2F;v2.0&#x2F;docs</a>
评论 #8387022 未加载
评论 #8387006 未加载
bshimmin超过 10 年前
I looked at this in Chrome and honestly couldn&#x27;t figure out if the examples were actually working.<p>Also, Stylus seems a curious choice (not because it&#x27;s bad, just that it&#x27;s not exactly the frontrunner in the CSS preprocessor race). I&#x27;m not even sure why a CSS preprocessor is even necessary, to be honest.
评论 #8387223 未加载
评论 #8391228 未加载
评论 #8387250 未加载
Yuioup超过 10 年前
&quot;Brick&quot; has a negative connotation in the tech world.
评论 #8387522 未加载
评论 #8388787 未加载
评论 #8388788 未加载
评论 #8388329 未加载
moondowner超过 10 年前
There are some invalid links on the page:<p>- &#x27;Fork me on Github&#x27; points to <a href="https://github.com/gkoberger/test" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;gkoberger&#x2F;test</a> instead of <a href="https://github.com/mozbrick/brick" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;mozbrick&#x2F;brick</a><p>- The Github link at the &#x27;Keep Up To Date&#x27; section points to <a href="http://twitter.com/mozbrick" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;twitter.com&#x2F;mozbrick</a><p>Update: Nice to see that the links are fixed.
dkyc超过 10 年前
For me personally, the challenge UI frameworks like Bootstrap solve is the <i>pure UI</i>. That is, which borders, shadows and spacings to use and such stuff. A thin layer on top of the actual APIs like Mozilla Brick does not seem too useful to me - why bother adding a third party component if it merely wraps the functionality of HTML&#x2F;CSS? (Although I must admit I haven&#x27;t used Brick yet.)
maga超过 10 年前
Hm... am I correct that the brick-action component is actually their way of setting up a listener, like Backbone&#x27;s obj.listenTo(anotherObj, &#x27;event&#x27;, callback)? Well, in that case it&#x27;s one hell of an overhead, imagine creating an actual DOM element for every single event listener.
tkubacki超过 10 年前
Firefox still does not seem to support fully web components (html templates, custom elements, shadowdom see <a href="http://caniuse.com/#search=shadowdom" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;caniuse.com&#x2F;#search=shadowdom</a> )<p>I hope they will get there fast - this will put pressure on dinosaurs like IE or Safari
评论 #8387055 未加载
cdnsteve超过 10 年前
So web components. Haven&#x27;t used them yet. What&#x27;s the selling point on this vs Google&#x27;s Polymer?
评论 #8390883 未加载
评论 #8389320 未加载
评论 #8389193 未加载
aaronbrethorst超过 10 年前
The first two demos aren&#x27;t styled, and don&#x27;t work in Safari 8, and the third one says &quot;coming soon.&quot; C&#x27;mon, guys...I understand I&#x27;m in the minority for using Safari, but you really need to think about the demo&#x27;ability of what you build.
BinaryIdiot超过 10 年前
I don&#x27;t see a reference to Mozilla&#x27;s X-Tags. X-Tags already links to listings of web components so why is this so different than that listing but also similar?
评论 #8391421 未加载
评论 #8389323 未加载
bdcravens超过 10 年前
Designmodo has their own UI framework, The Bricks:<p><a href="http://designmodo.com/the-bricks/" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;designmodo.com&#x2F;the-bricks&#x2F;</a><p>Seems a bit close for comfort
评论 #8386995 未加载
评论 #8387026 未加载
itry超过 10 年前
Can I use this client-side? From what I read on the page this seems to be only geared towards a certain server-side-setup with node.js, brewer and stuff.
评论 #8387172 未加载
评论 #8387178 未加载
serve_yay超过 10 年前
I tried to look at the &quot;tab bar&quot; on my iPad, it just looked like a regular unstyled document, didn&#x27;t seem to respond to any taps. Guess I just don&#x27;t get it!
评论 #8389437 未加载
giancarlostoro超过 10 年前
I wonder when we&#x27;ll have projects like this targeting all browsers, and specialized functionalities for projects like Node-Webkit, maybe a fork of Bootstrap tailored towards total customization of Node-Webkit, or even a PureCSS fork as well. After using applications like Atraci, SickBeard, and others I&#x27;ve really come to enjoy desktop applications with web based UI&#x27;s more.<p>On another note, as someone else mentioned, there&#x27;s too many package managers, a package manager that detects when you try to use a package manager you don&#x27;t have installed, and installs it for you would be a neat project to have, although talk about dependency hell.
评论 #8387206 未加载
评论 #8387200 未加载
mrweasel超过 10 年前
It seems a little incomplete, or am I just missing the point?
suyash超过 10 年前
I like how the documentation and example area laid out side by side, anyone cares to describe how they accomplished that? Thanks aot.
评论 #8387143 未加载
评论 #8387156 未加载
评论 #8388013 未加载
wudf超过 10 年前
It&#x27;s so bare, I love it. Just add more components and we might have something usable for front end developers.
antocv超过 10 年前
Can we get a package manager for package managers?<p>There is so many already, its hard to keep track what names come from what repositories of what package managers.<p>It used to be so simple, yourDistroPackageManager install whatever, now there is x2000 versions of packageManager.
评论 #8387441 未加载
评论 #8388056 未加载
jiyinyiyong超过 10 年前
Since Pete Hunt said Web Components might be bad idea, I become less enthusiastic about those things. But they look really powerful.
评论 #8387205 未加载