TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Lapham's Quarterly

27 点作者 jonathansizz超过 10 年前

7 条评论

benbreen超过 10 年前
I love Lapham's Quarterly. Also, what a missed opportunity it represents for Harper's (Lapham's previous employer). Harper's has been famously slow to embrace the web and as a result has been declining lately despite still featuring strong writing. Lapham is an octogenarian and very old school in many ways, but has still managed to pull off the print/web hybrid format in a way that Harper's hasn't. I can easily imagine an alternate reality where LQ is a Harper's vertical as opposed to an independent breakaway journal.
评论 #8460845 未加载
jianshen超过 10 年前
Lapham's Quarterly is another example of print never going away (though it may become a niche one day like vinyl records). Their attention to physical detail in paper, ink and illustration gives each issue a tangible value that's hard to replicate in the digital world no matter how "interactive" you might make it.
arjn超过 10 年前
I&#x27;ve been a reader of Lapham&#x27;s Quarterly for about 2 years now. So much better than watching TV and crappy movies.<p>Its kind of meant to be a starting point for readers to find something interesting and follow it through in more detail.<p>Similar to a curated list of topics with short bits of content to pique interest.<p>I love it.
eggoa超过 10 年前
I was a fan of the magazine and subscribed for the first two years, largely on the strength of the inaugural issue focusing on war. In a way I think they kind of cheated with that issue because it turns out that there is a huge amount of compelling writing and art on the subject of war -- massively more than some of the late subjects they chose.<p>Particularly the &quot;money&quot; issue seemed amazing superficial. As in most of the extracts were just various ways marveling at the concept of fungibility.<p>(Or maybe I don&#x27;t appreciate it because I&#x27;m not as smart as Lewis Lapham.)
评论 #8461050 未加载
ritchiea超过 10 年前
They have an excellent 404 page, see here: <a href="http://www.laphamsquarterly.org/foobar/" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.laphamsquarterly.org&#x2F;foobar&#x2F;</a>
hoprocker超过 10 年前
Mr Lapham&#x27;s writings in the Harper&#x27;s Notebook column justified the cost of the subscription for me. The breadth of scope he would bring always amazed me.
dang超过 10 年前
Much as we like Lapham&#x27;s, it would be better to post a substantive article from the website instead of the magazine home page.