TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

A New Provable Factoring Algorithm

59 点作者 mr_tyzic超过 10 年前

3 条评论

Sniffnoy超过 10 年前
I'm a little confused as to what distinction is being made here between "provable" and "unprovable" factoring algorithms. Is it just that "provable" ones may output the correct result all the time, while "unprovable" ones are probabilistic and output the correct result with high probability? (E.g., roughly the distinction between P or ZPP on the one hand and BPP on the other hand, if these hypothetically ran in polynomial time and we were talking about decision problems.) Or is something even weaker meant by "unprovable", like retuning possibly incorrect results based not on a random input but on the number to be factored? I assume it's the former -- if it were the latter I'd say such things are not really factoring algorithms, practically useful as they might be -- but the way it's worded isn't exactly clear.
评论 #8497414 未加载
评论 #8497650 未加载
评论 #8497727 未加载
phkahler超过 10 年前
I found an algorithm to determine the parity (even or odd) of the number of factors in N. Never wrote about it because IDK if it's unique, and also because it's time complexity seems poor and I never tried to prove any upper bound or make it faster. Anyone know of something similar? Would this be interesting?
评论 #8498164 未加载
评论 #8498758 未加载
评论 #8499384 未加载
h3xe超过 10 年前
<p><pre><code> I want to replace systems like AES with ones that uses the hardness of factoring for their security. Systems like AES rely on intuition and experimental testing for their security—there is not even a conditional proof that they are secure. </code></pre> 1) You can prove symmetric crypto is secure 2) In the light of (upcoming fast) factoring algorithms, using crypto that relies on factoring everywhere sounds very stupid.
评论 #8499238 未加载