TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Amazon Fire TV Stick

87 点作者 kshatrea超过 10 年前

35 条评论

Someone1234超过 10 年前
&gt; Powerful performance—4x the storage and 2x the memory of Chromecast, plus a dual-core processor and 1 GB of memory.<p>This one line shows that they really don&#x27;t &quot;get&quot; the appeal of a Chromecast. Even as a techie I really don&#x27;t care what specs a Chromecast has, I just want it to &quot;just work&quot; and it does &quot;just work.&quot;<p>If Amazon&#x27;s one &quot;just works&quot; then that is good. But the fact they&#x27;re trying to shove too much into it (games, remote, tons of apps, etc) suggests to me that they&#x27;re over-thinking it and it will require more prodding.<p>Chromecast does one thing and it does it REALLY well (and inexpensively). More companies could learn a thing or two.<p>PS - Amazon locking Amazon Digital into their own devices is pathetic. All it does is decrease the value of their own services, it doesn&#x27;t increase the value of their hardware.
评论 #8516388 未加载
评论 #8515753 未加载
评论 #8522073 未加载
评论 #8515747 未加载
icefox超过 10 年前
It seems odd that just like the Fire TV they have tech as the number one item to try to sell you on the product<p>&quot;Powerful performance—4x the storage and 2x the memory of Chromecast, plus a dual-core processor and 1 GB of memory.&quot;<p>The above tells me nothing about how it will entertain me.
评论 #8515558 未加载
评论 #8515534 未加载
评论 #8515935 未加载
评论 #8515852 未加载
评论 #8515936 未加载
untog超过 10 年前
So it&#x27;s cheaper than a Roku stick (right now) and offers much of the same stuff. I&#x27;m still backing Roku here, though, as I don&#x27;t want one video provider to control my hardware. There&#x27;s a horrifying future in here somewhere where I have an Amazon stick for my Prime videos, an HBO stick for HBO Go, etc. etc.
评论 #8515484 未加载
评论 #8516446 未加载
fpgeek超过 10 年前
Is it sad my first thought was: There goes any chance for Amazon Instant Video on Chromecast and&#x2F;or Android TV for the foreseeable future?
评论 #8515685 未加载
saurik超过 10 年前
Today&#x27;s other headline: &quot;Amazon has $83 million worth of Fire Phones it can&#x27;t sell&quot; [1]; hopefully this new Fire product will work out better for them ;P.<p>[1] <a href="http://www.geek.com/mobile/amazon-has-83-million-worth-of-fire-phones-it-cant-sell-1607718/" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.geek.com&#x2F;mobile&#x2F;amazon-has-83-million-worth-of-fi...</a>
评论 #8515686 未加载
bsimpson超过 10 年前
They ought to implement DIAL (aka Google Cast). Then, instead of their pitch being &quot;specs you don&#x27;t care about have bigger numbers than Chromecast,&quot; it could be &quot;everything that&#x27;s great about Chromecast, and then some.&quot;
评论 #8518767 未加载
评论 #8518525 未加载
madoublet超过 10 年前
Am I alone in wondering why neither Amazon, Roku, nor Apple have tackled the OTA DVR space? I know there are some options out there like Tablo and SimpleTV, but their implementations are not very good. This would seem like a big differentiator for these set top boxes, b&#x2F;c they are all kind of the same right now.
评论 #8515530 未加载
评论 #8515501 未加载
评论 #8515489 未加载
评论 #8515648 未加载
评论 #8515474 未加载
评论 #8515475 未加载
adricnet超过 10 年前
I don&#x27;t understand the niche for this product, especially against their own Fire TV (which FD I have and like a fair bit).<p>From the catalog page details, besides the portability of the stick model (use USB with some TVs so no need for AC power) it seems there are some games that will not play on the stick. That seems a bit crunchy and weird for customers and developers.<p>Any one see or know any other differentiators that make this worth an additional SKU, support costs?
评论 #8515552 未加载
评论 #8518306 未加载
SideburnsOfDoom超过 10 年前
I&#x27;m still a bit puzzled by chromcast et all.<p>I have a Sony TV purchased this year. It has apps on board including YouTube and BBC iPlayer. But I don&#x27;t use that. I have connected it to a PS3 on which I can play DVD and blue-ray disks, and YouTube, BBC iPlayer and Blinkbox apps. Both the TV and PS3 are, of course, connected to the internet via the home broadband.<p>What additional features would this kind of device give me?
评论 #8515620 未加载
评论 #8515564 未加载
评论 #8515568 未加载
评论 #8515864 未加载
评论 #8515539 未加载
评论 #8515560 未加载
评论 #8515537 未加载
评论 #8516423 未加载
评论 #8515546 未加载
评论 #8515579 未加载
Rudism超过 10 年前
Does anyone know if Amazon or Google are somehow obfuscating or DRMing their casting protocols to these devices? If anyone ever made an unofficial 3rd party stick that supported both Amazon Prime plus all of the services already supported on Chromecast I&#x27;d buy one for every TV in a heartbeat. Until then I&#x27;ll probably stick to Rokus.
twoodfin超过 10 年前
For $20, this was a no-brainer purchase, even if my primary use ends up being streaming to hotel TVs.
评论 #8515464 未加载
评论 #8515659 未加载
cletus超过 10 年前
I really don&#x27;t understand Amazon&#x27;s strategy here at all.<p>Every large company goes through this stage where they switch from actively building their business to essentially being afraid that something will come along and kill them. It happened to Microsoft in the 90s (although, in fairness, the Internet did almost kill them). It&#x27;s happened to Google (Google Offers anyone?). And it sure as hell looks like it&#x27;s happening (big time) to Amazon.<p>Amazon is really good at two things:<p>- selling you stuff<p>- oddly enough, cloud services.<p>Several years ago they, for whatever reason, embarked on a strategy of wanting to be in online content and mobile platforms.<p>Amazon Prime was (and is) a hugely popular service. Yet it&#x27;s been bundled with Prime Instant Video, essentially a Netflix clone. Why Amazon felt this was necessary or even a good idea is beyond me.<p>As soon as you force bundle one service with the other it makes the latter worse and hides the deficiencies of the former. Good products and services sell themselves at a certain point. If Amazon Instant Video was really great, why can&#x27;t I buy just that? Why make Prime more expensive? Amazon is creating room for a comeptitor here.<p>And then we get to the Fire tablets, phones and now media sticks. Amazon decided to treat Google as a competitor here so none of their devices come with the Google apps. This is a curious move because Amazon obviously sees itself as a competitor and rival to Apple, Google and Microsoft here. Why exactly?<p>If you&#x27;re going to be in the phone business and competing with someone, do you really want to be beholden to the platform that company produces (ie Android)? Sure they can fork it (and have) but you know they&#x27;ll be taking updates too.<p>I really have to wonder if Bezos has gone all Howard Hughes lately. He seems to feel this strategy is deeply important yet, as best as I can tell, these products are mediocre at best and no one has really articulated why this is important to the future of Amazon.<p>Disclaimer: I work for Google. These opinions are purely my own.
评论 #8515833 未加载
arb99超过 10 年前
Interesting that as one of the main images for it, they use &#x27;flappy birds&#x27; (<a href="http://g-ecx.images-amazon.com/images/G/01/kindle/dp/2014/M/m-slate-04-lg._V322539675_.jpg" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;g-ecx.images-amazon.com&#x2F;images&#x2F;G&#x2F;01&#x2F;kindle&#x2F;dp&#x2F;2014&#x2F;M&#x2F;...</a>)<p>according to wikipedia, its an official version (<a href="http://g-ecx.images-amazon.com/images/G/01/kindle/dp/2014/M/m-slate-04-lg._V322539675_.jpg" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;g-ecx.images-amazon.com&#x2F;images&#x2F;G&#x2F;01&#x2F;kindle&#x2F;dp&#x2F;2014&#x2F;M&#x2F;...</a>)
stevenhubertron超过 10 年前
An interesting combination that would only cost you $118 is the Fire Stick and the Fire HD 6. For the price of basically an Apple TV you can have everything the stick does, plus one hella cool remote to control everything you beam to the TV. Sure my iPhone can do it as well, but there is something cool about just leaving the Fire as a dedicated remote. That might just be be though.<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Fire-HD-Display-Wi-Fi-GB/dp/B00KC6I06S/" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.amazon.com&#x2F;Fire-HD-Display-Wi-Fi-GB&#x2F;dp&#x2F;B00KC6I06S...</a>
stonesam92超过 10 年前
Interesting that they mention Netflix before Amazon Instant Video in the description.<p>&quot;It&#x27;s an easy way to enjoy Netflix, Amazon Instant Video, Hulu Plus, YouTube.com, music, and much more&quot;
评论 #8515830 未加载
SSilver2k2超过 10 年前
My coworker thinks it should&#x27;ve been called the Fire Torch
mrbill超过 10 年前
For $20 each (for Prime members), sure, I&#x27;ll buy two - I&#x27;ll find a use for them somewhere even if it&#x27;s giving them to friends as gifts.
amykhar超过 10 年前
I wish companies would quit making hardware and just make apps for the existing hardware. I am so tired of having to have multiple boxes.
评论 #8515826 未加载
jimktrains2超过 10 年前
I bought a FireTV. It wouldn&#x27;t work with my TV and Netflix would constantly stop and buffer (I think it forced an HD stream). I returned it and got a Roku and it just works perfectly.<p>I wonder if this will have compatibility problems. The TV reported as meeting the requirements and my computer finds and configures it as a 720p monitor.
drivingmenuts超过 10 年前
Theoretically, my TV already does this (mine in particular is not a smart TV, but apparently all the rest are), so why do I need this?<p>To me, this looks like Amazon is marketing to an audience that is slowly dying off anyway. Which doesn&#x27;t seem like a good way forward.
评论 #8516506 未加载
chrisBob超过 10 年前
I keep looking for something that will make me replace my iPad2 with an HDMI adapter, and this doesn&#x27;t do it. The app support on the iPad is much better, and it is a great way to use an aging device. Even the iPad2 plays videos very well.
coob超过 10 年前
I can&#x27;t wait to see how hackable these things are. Decent processor, HDMI out, WiFi, 1GB RAM… pretty decent package.<p>I know there are other cheap android sticks out there but one with a remote for $39 is pretty tempting.
评论 #8515768 未加载
undrwatr超过 10 年前
FCC ID:2ABDU-0509<p>Most info is still under short term confidentiality but they are supposed to release that once marketing and sales begin. So complain to the FCC if you want so we can see the internal photos.
hammock超过 10 年前
I dont understand why these things can&#x27;t browse the internet
评论 #8515519 未加载
评论 #8515553 未加载
评论 #8518378 未加载
taude超过 10 年前
I notice that in their comparison grid that they don&#x27;t list Google content.<p>No thanks, I don&#x27;t want a streaming stick for each online service, so I think I&#x27;ll stick to my Roku.
eli超过 10 年前
Can I stream my desktop to the TV? Doesn&#x27;t seem like it.
评论 #8516015 未加载
评论 #8515525 未加载
feld超过 10 年前
I need to replace the Roku 2 in my bedroom as it is getting long in the tooth, but this won&#x27;t work for me until they support NHL Gamecenter Live.
absolutesynd超过 10 年前
This market is getting awful crowed: AppleTv, Roku, ChromeCast, and not to mention offering from manufacturers that are built into the tv.
AndrewDucker超过 10 年前
Will let you play personal videos - but only from the cloud, so far as I can see.<p>I&#x27;ll stick to the Matchstick, which is promising DLNA access.
pm90超过 10 年前
The first thing I noticed was: an actual remote. Are you serious Amazon?<p>I think Google got it absolutely right with chromecast. I love the convenience of using my cellphone as the orchestrator of all my digital entertainment. Think about it: single device that is my interface to digital entertainment; maybe AI in the future would replace even the little effort I do have to make. And Amazon comes up with....a remote? No, no no.<p>I really hope this doesn&#x27;t catch on.
评论 #8516602 未加载
hatred超过 10 年前
Any info on HBO Go support ?
评论 #8515441 未加载
digital-rubber超过 10 年前
If only they could re-use the hardware of the not sold fire phones.. :-)
ElijahLynn超过 10 年前
Hooray for competition!!
SnaKeZ超过 10 年前
What&#x27;s OS? Android?
评论 #8515492 未加载
hagope超过 10 年前
$19 for prime members!