TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Windscale Piles: Cockcroft's Follies avoided nuclear disaster

34 点作者 parados超过 10 年前

3 条评论

parados超过 10 年前
My thermodynamics professor was there as a young scientist when this happened. From what he told us (probably in clear breach of the Official Secrets Act) this was a truly terrifying accident. The absence of temperature data meant that it was impossible to know how extensive the fire was or what remedies would work. Eventually, in desperation, water was used despite the clear hazard of creating a catastrophic Hydrogen/Oxygen explosion. My professor recalled being sent up these towers to monitor any radiation release, perhaps an early example of "this is a job for the intern".
评论 #8559055 未加载
评论 #8559817 未加载
评论 #8559027 未加载
arethuza超过 10 年前
This accident, along with quite a few others, is covered in the excellent book: <i>Atomic Accidents: A History of Nuclear Meltdowns and Disasters: From the Ozark Mountains to Fukushima</i> by James Mahaffey:<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Atomic-Accidents-Meltdowns-Disasters-Mountains/dp/1605984922/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1415135359&amp;sr=8-1&amp;keywords=atomic+accidents+a+history" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.amazon.com&#x2F;Atomic-Accidents-Meltdowns-Disasters-M...</a><p>Edit: The book is no way anti-nuclear and actually starts with a description of a horrific accident at a hydro-electric plant.
评论 #8559578 未加载
miander超过 10 年前
I think Cockcroft is a small hero in this story. He expended significant political capital to push through a very unpopular idea because he could see the importance at a time when absolute safety was not the first concern. Brave.