From the IEEE source [1] it says that he bought $25 web cams for the project (apparently MSRP$75). I doubt the side-facing cameras get any type of picture quality at all at 30mph, let alone 62. (Update: motion is <i>extremely</i> blurry at high resolution [2]).<p>Also, from the IEEE article "I wrote a Python script to capture the eight 1280-by-1024 JPEG files. That capture takes about 8 seconds." That results in 8 non-synchronus pictures, taken at 8 second intervals.<p>At 30mph (44 feet per second), eight seconds is a 352 foot gap—a standard block in Manhattan is about 264 by 900 feet [3], which leaves you <i>one capture every 1.3 blocks</i> on the short streets.<p>Interesting way to make a 360 degree camera. Completely unreasonable for a 360 degree camera <i>in motion</i>.<p>.<p>[1]<a href="http://spectrum.ieee.org/geek-life/hands-on/diy-streetview-camera/0" rel="nofollow">http://spectrum.ieee.org/geek-life/hands-on/diy-streetview-c...</a><p>[2]<a href="http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=232323867291121678&ei=x4HFSsy1H46VlAe58qXfBg&q=+NX-6000&hl=en&client=safari#" rel="nofollow">http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=232323867291121678&#...</a><p>[3]<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/City_block" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/City_block</a>