TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Eeek! The Web without JavaScript -- Do you design sites for the JS-impaired?

7 点作者 estherschindler超过 17 年前

5 条评论

croby超过 17 年前
This, to me, feels similar to the outdated practice of including all JS in HTML comments for 'older browsers'. Crockford has a good paragraph on this in one of his articles. <p>"The use of HTML comments in scripts dates further back to a transitional problem between Netscape Navigator and Netscape Navigator 2. The latter introduced the &#60;script&#62; tag. However, users of the former would see the script as text because of the HTML convention that unrecognized markup is ignored. The &#60;!-- comment hack stopped being necessary by the time Netscape Navigator 3 came out. It certainly is not needed now. It is ugly and a waste of space."<p>People use to turn off JavaScript because the web was new and people were using it improperly. Based on the proliferation of everything JS these days, it feels like we've overcome this barrier, just like we've overcome Netscape 2.<p> I also feel like the analogy the author makes between 'designing for accessibility' to 'using JavaScript' is improper. I think if the article criticized the usage of Flash, it'd be a different story -- Flash used to be completely inaccessible and it (still) requires someone to download a plugin for it to work. Even so, youtube and the myspace music player (both Flash) are still incredibly popular on the web -- despite that barrier to entry. Something to think about -- maybe prompting to turn on JavaScript solves the problem, just like saying you need to install flash solves the flash problem.
brlewis超过 17 年前
Interesting topic, but 40% seems like a high number of "buyers" with JS turned off. I wonder if they counted all web hits as "people who buy" and 39% of their hits came from bots.
评论 #86134 未加载
Hexstream超过 17 年前
What I plan to do for my first site is to to first load the page (javascript included) as if Javascript was disabled, and then have the JS rearrange the page (optimize it for javascript) if the code runs.<p>Any problems with that approach? It seems the most robust to me.
评论 #86081 未加载
asmosoinio超过 17 年前
Does anyone have any statistics about users and JavaScript?
edw519超过 17 年前
Do you design sites for people without a mouse?<p>Do you design sites for people without a keyboard?<p>Do you design sites for people without a monitor?<p>Do you design sites for people without &#60;you get the idea&#62;?