TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Statistical Inference for Everyone

162 点作者 jeffmax超过 10 年前

4 条评论

edtechdev超过 10 年前
Here are some more interactive and effective ways to learn stats online. The Open Learning Initiative&#x27;s open Probability &amp; Statistics Course out of Carnegie Mellon might just be the most researched and carefully designed course out there. <a href="http://oli.cmu.edu/courses/free-open/statistics-course-details/" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;oli.cmu.edu&#x2F;courses&#x2F;free-open&#x2F;statistics-course-detai...</a> Students learn more statistics concepts in half the time as a traditional stats course. <a href="http://oli.cmu.edu/get-to-know-oli/see-our-proven-results/" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;oli.cmu.edu&#x2F;get-to-know-oli&#x2F;see-our-proven-results&#x2F;</a><p>The Statistics Online Computational Resource (SOCR) site is also amazing for actually learning and playing with common statistical tests and tools: <a href="http://www.socr.ucla.edu/" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.socr.ucla.edu&#x2F;</a><p>Collaborative Statistics is a free and interactive statistics textbook: <a href="https://www.kno.com/book/details/productId/txt9780983804905" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.kno.com&#x2F;book&#x2F;details&#x2F;productId&#x2F;txt9780983804905</a><p>You can also run Sage, R, Python, Octave (Matlab clone) and other tools right in the browser now: <a href="https://cloud.sagemath.com/" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;cloud.sagemath.com&#x2F;</a>
评论 #8639532 未加载
daniel-levin超过 10 年前
This book interesting because it forgoes the traditional approach of most mathematical statistics books. The preface states that it is done like this in order to avoid the &quot;cookbook&quot; approach taken by many statistics students. This is why it is ironic that &quot;Bayes&#x27; Recipe&quot; appears 15 times in this text, and on page 131 there is a five step algorithm for parameter estimation, and my favourite, oft-repeated, never explained recipe - &quot;n &gt; 30, you&#x27;ll be fine&quot;. There is no mention of the CLT, MLE, method of moments estimation, biasedness of estimators, convergence in probability, how sampling distributions arise, or any of the theory of distributions that underpin all of the inferential procedures detailed in the book. I think that excluding these topics actually increases the cookbooky-ness of the text.<p>It is important that students understand the provenance of the inferential techniques they use so that they don&#x27;t land up doing bogus science (which hurts the world) by not knowing the failure modes of these techniques. Of course not all students of statistics know the requisite mathematics to understand it all, at the very least put the failure modes into a cookbook form.<p>For the sake of science please don&#x27;t ever do any inferential statistics without knowing when the method you&#x27;re using works and when it breaks, what it is robust to, and what assumptions it makes. Statistics is really easy to break when used naively. The mathematics of statistics is not easy, and often results are highly counter-intuitive.
评论 #8656002 未加载
评论 #8641003 未加载
评论 #8640677 未加载
grayclhn超过 10 年前
I haven&#x27;t looked at it carefully, but it&#x27;s hard to think of a setting where I&#x27;d want to teach from this book: it&#x27;s aimed at stats 101 students, but uses python as the programming language (great language, but far beyond what I&#x27;d expect a typical intro stats student to be able to handle); it advocates bayesian statistics, which is a reasonable decision, but seems to take it to such an extreme that &quot;hypothesis test&quot; never appears in the table of contents...<p>But, it&#x27;s obviously a labor of love and it&#x27;s an interesting take on intro to stats. And, from skimming it, I don&#x27;t see anything in it that&#x27;s wrong. So this might be a good intro to bayesian stats for most HN readers.<p>edit: there is a <i>wide</i> range of quality for the graphs, though. Some look great, but some (the histograms especially) are... unappealing. And the formatting for the code sections is quite at odds with the style of the rest of the book. Those are minor, though.<p>second edit: not to start a license flamewar, but can this book be redistributed? It&#x27;s licensed under either CC or GNU FDL, but I don&#x27;t see a way to get the source code. So anyone hosting a copy would also need to license it under the FDL (since they can&#x27;t remove the FDL licensing from the pdf), which they would then be violating. Am I understanding things correctly, or am I wrong?
评论 #8639214 未加载
评论 #8639426 未加载
Perceval超过 10 年前
Hopefully they can fix the embarrassing typo: &quot;Monte Hall problem&quot; should be &quot;Monty.&quot; Not sure how that could have escaped notice. Maybe they were thinking about Monte Carlo simulations when writing that bit, but someone should have caught this.
评论 #8638536 未加载
评论 #8638206 未加载