TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

What I.Q. doesn't tell you about race

31 点作者 tpyo超过 15 年前

7 条评论

mynameishere超过 15 年前
The second sentence is a straw man. Skimming the text, I see that's much the case throughout. Gladwell, if you look past his charming style, is extremely sloppy. Everybody who has researched IQ has come across the twin studies which amply prove that IQ is not immutable. But the only one ignoring such studies is the actual "fundamentalists" who deny that genetics has anything at all to do with intelligence.<p>The increase in IQ from nutrition and education is going to experience stark diminishing returns, as has already been seen.<p><a href="http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/custom/portlets/recordDetails/detailmini.jsp?_nfpb=true&#38;_&#38;ERICExtSearch_SearchValue_0=EJ729986&#38;ERICExtSearch_SearchType_0=no&#38;accno=EJ729986" rel="nofollow">http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/custom/portlets/recordD...</a>
评论 #865601 未加载
评论 #865843 未加载
评论 #865545 未加载
评论 #865516 未加载
评论 #865661 未加载
akamaka超过 15 年前
I lost any interest in what Malcolm Gladwell has to say about race after he argued that East Asian children have better math skills because their ancestors cultivated rice and not wheat.<p><a href="http://www.pressrun.net/weblog/2009/09/outliers-whats-rice-got-to-do-with-maths.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.pressrun.net/weblog/2009/09/outliers-whats-rice-g...</a>
评论 #865990 未加载
michaelkeenan超过 15 年前
<i>Drawing heavily on the work of J. Philippe Rushton—a psychologist who specializes in comparing the circumference of what he calls the Negroid brain with the length of the Negroid penis—Saletan took the fundamentalist position to its logical conclusion.</i><p>This essay doesn't attempt to accurately and fairly summarize opposing arguments.
panic超过 15 年前
It's possible that education is increasingly providing the kind of skills necessary to do well on IQ tests.
评论 #865654 未加载
chrischen超过 15 年前
Could be that women go for smarter men. So evolution has done its part over the years and weeded out the low IQ genes, hehe.
评论 #866321 未加载
评论 #865862 未加载
tokenadult超过 15 年前
An interesting review of a very worthwhile book. Here are some more comments on the same book:<p>"It is not just the fascinating effect that makes the book special. It's also Flynn's style. There's an unusual combination of clarity, wit, apposite allusion, and farsightedness in making connections and exploring unexpected consequences. The Flynn effect, in Flynn's hands, makes a good, gripping, puzzling, and not-quite-finished story..." --Ian Deary, Edinburgh University<p>"This book is a gold mine of pointers to interesting work, much of which was new to me. All of us who wrestle with the extraordinarily difficult questions about intelligence that Flynn discusses are in his debt.." --Charles Murray, American Enterprise Institute &#38; co-author of The Bell Curve<p>"This highly engaging, and very readable, book takes forward the Dickens/Flynn model of intelligence in the form of asking yet more provocative questions. . . A most unusual book, one that holds the reader's attention and leaves behind concepts and ideas that force us to rethink all sorts of issues.." --Sir Michael Rutter, Kings College London<p>"Flynn provides the first satisfying explanation of the massive rise in IQ test scores. He avoids both the absurd conclusion that our great grandparents were all mentally retarded and the equally unsatisfactory suggestion that the rise has just been in performance on IQ tests without any wider implications.." --N. J. Mackintosh, University of Cambridge<p>"Citing many scholarly works, Flynn paints a dynamic picture of what intelligence is and the role of a person's genetic background, physiology and neurology, immediate environment and broader social factors...he has produced an impressively multidimensional and often wise look at the elusive topic of human intelligence." --Publisher's Weekly<p>"In What is Intelligence? James R. Flynn...suggests that we should not faciley equate IQ gains with intelligence gains. He says that it's necessary to 'dissect intelligence' into its component parts: 'solving mathematical problems, interpreteing the great works of literature, finding on the spot solutions, assimilating the scientific worldview, critical acumen and wisdom.' When this dissection is carried out, several paradoxes emerge, which Flynn in this engaging book attempts to reconcile." --Richard Restak, American Scholar<p>"The 20th century saw the "Flynn Effect" - massive gains in IQ from one generation to another." --Scientific American Mind<p>"In a brilliant interweaving of data and argument, Flynn calls into question fundamental assumptions about the nature of intelligence that have driven the field for the past century. There is something here for everyone to lose sleep over. His solution to the perplexing issues revolving around IQ gains over time will give the IQ Ayatollahs fits!." --S. J. Ceci, Cornell University<p>"What Is Intelligence? is one of the best books I have read on intelligence-ever...This is a brilliant book because, first, it helps resolve paradoxes that, in the past, seemed not to lend themselves to any sensible solutions...one of the best things about the book is Flynn's sense of humility...this is a masterful book that will influence thinking about intelligence for many years to come. It is one of those few books for which one can truly say that it is must reading for anyone." --Robert J. Sternberg, PsycCRITIQUES<p>"...In this thoughtful, well-written book, Flynn offers an account of why the so-called Flynn effect occurs and what it means (and does not mean)....This is the clearest, most engaging work on intelligence....All will learn from the author's nuanced arguments. Some may quibble with Flynn's observations, but their work is cut for them: one cannot fault his clarity or ingenuity. Essential." --D.S. Dunn, Moravian College, CHOICE<p>"...James Flynn is best known for having discovered a stubborn fact...he established that in every country where consistent IQ tests have been given to large numbers of people over time, scores have been rising as far back as the records go, in some cases to the early 20th century. What Is Intelligence? is Flynn's attempt to explain this phenomenon, now known as the Flynn effect... an important take on what we have made of ourselves over the past few centuries and might yet make of ourselves in the future." --Cosma Shalizi, Assistant Professor in the Statistics Department at Carnegie Mellon University and an external professor at the Santa Fe Institute, American Scientist<p>Link to description of the book (whence those reviews came):<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/What-Intelligence-Beyond-Flynn-Effect/dp/0521741475/" rel="nofollow">http://www.amazon.com/What-Intelligence-Beyond-Flynn-Effect/...</a><p>An in-depth transcript of a lecture by the author:<p><a href="http://www.psychometrics.sps.cam.ac.uk/page/109/beyond-the-flynn-effect.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.psychometrics.sps.cam.ac.uk/page/109/beyond-the-f...</a>
kingkongrevenge超过 15 年前
&#62; These days, when talk turns to the supposed genetic differences in the intelligence of certain races, Southern Italians have disappeared from the discussion.<p>Not been to the guido hood lately?
评论 #865585 未加载