TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Linux Security Distros Compared: Tails vs. Kali vs. Qubes

9 点作者 yiedyie超过 10 年前

1 comment

hga超过 10 年前
Sort of a nonsensical premise, the three highlighted distributions have entirely different goals (use Tor, penetration testing, and security through VM isolation), but it does give minimal overviews of each, plus mentions a few more in passing. Worth it if you aren&#x27;t familiar with each, or one that matches your possible interests.<p>Side note: Qubes, or perhaps the woman developing it, is sort of scary. I was reading ... her blog, I think, where the discussion had turned to the open sourcing of a provably secure microkernel. Alas, that&#x27;s only with an embedded ARM system, they didn&#x27;t even a try a serious proof with x86.<p>And for good reason, besides covering how difficult this was in principle (e.g. chipsets, IOMMUs), she mentioned finding a remote execution exploit that never touches your OS, it compromised a network card and rewrote its EEPROM, then on the next boot exploited a secure boot &quot;feature&quot;. Kinda makes you despair about the current state of security :-(.