TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Ask HN: How can we solve diversity in tech talent without allocating quotas?

6 点作者 kedargj超过 10 年前
Most commentary and discussions tend to highlight % of people by gender and race, while hinting at allocating quotas in order to bring better balance to the work force.<p>I feel this maybe a flawed approach and there could be a better way to address diversity without going down the quotas approach.<p>What do think?

4 条评论

lastofus超过 10 年前
Quotas are not the answer... (I can&#x27;t think of anything I&#x27;ve read recently that hinted as such)<p>The answer is similar to the answer for problems that have been recently highlighted by the Ferguson catastrofuck.<p>And that answer is to figure out how to remove systemic and often institutionalized biases and narratives that have been baked into our society and in turn the heads of individuals growing up and living in it. That&#x27;s the first step. The second is to figure out a solution to the income inequality that opens so many doors for some, and keeps them closed for so many others. It&#x27;s about creating a fair playing field for everyone, where a theoretical, honest to god meritocracy could actually perhaps exist.<p>How does one go about doing that? No fucking clue.
评论 #8671371 未加载
评论 #8675191 未加载
webmaven超过 10 年前
Quotas are exactly what you need. But not <i>hiring</i> quotas.<p>Feel free to adjust the percentages below, but this is what you should aim for to eventually get to gender diversity (for example):<p>Tell recruiters you want 50% of the qualified candidates they send to you to be female.<p>Evaluate resumes in a form stripped of as much identifying information as possible.<p>Half of all candidates interviewed should be female. If not, try to identify an additional upstream bias, perhaps at the resume evaluation stage (example: Women have less free time for side projects, so make sure that when you evaluate a Github account it is for quality not quantity).<p>Aim for diversity in your interviewers. Half of the interviewing employees should be female. If that isn&#x27;t possible, at least one of the interviewing employees <i>must</i> be female (and if you only have one interviewing female employee, she should get a &#x27;creep factor&#x27; veto, <i>especially</i> if anyone else in the company (like a founder) has a veto. If that isn&#x27;t possible (because you have no female employees), <i>fix it and hire a woman already</i>.<p>That&#x27;s it. No need for actual hiring quotas after that point, you should be able to hire for merit out of the interviewees. If you end up not being gender diverse (ie. only industry average or below), <i>figure out why</i> (perhaps an existing interviewing employee is setting of <i>their</i> &#x27;creep factor&#x27; alarms so they don&#x27;t accept your offer, or there is a promotion bias and talented women aren&#x27;t sticking around after you hire them).<p>In parallel, you can make similar efforts around race, etc.
EvanZ超过 10 年前
Why not just hire based on merit, and let gender and race percentages fall where they may?
评论 #8669993 未加载
greenyoda超过 10 年前
By instituting quotas, wouldn&#x27;t companies be explicitly discriminating against potential employees (e.g., white males) based on gender and race, which is illegal under U.S. law?
评论 #8675167 未加载
评论 #8671628 未加载
评论 #8669948 未加载