Why do Haskell programmers see it as a good thing to package their abstractions in syntactic sugar?<p>Stop doing that. It makes it incredibly difficult to participate -- you basically need to learn 3 syntaxes on top of Haskell's own to contribute to any non-trivial project.<p>I'm referring to the article the post's author recommends:
<a href="http://www.haskellforall.com/2013/02/you-could-have-invented-comonads.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.haskellforall.com/2013/02/you-could-have-invented...</a>