TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Simplifying the EC2 Reserved Instance Model

42 点作者 ajdecon超过 10 年前

6 条评论

jasonefrank超过 10 年前
Pet peeve in case Jeff Barr (or another AWS person) reads this. I purchased multiple 3-year heavy utilization RIs just a few months before the price wars last year. The ROI on those went from "great" to "very modest" overnight. I know there is an RI Marketplace where I could try to sell them, but as the on-demand prices went down so far, I would not be likely to get a decent deal. It felt like the best customers, those who have committed for multiple years, were being left out in the cold. I will not be doing any long-term (over 1 year) RI purchases again unless they make it possible to participate in price drops.
评论 #8689784 未加载
评论 #8689760 未加载
评论 #8689780 未加载
Someone1234超过 10 年前
They didn&#x27;t hit any of my pain points.<p>The payment schemes weren&#x27;t particularly complex&#x2F;annoying. What is annoying is that when you purchase a RI you cannot just point at an existing VM and have the RI both bind to that but also select the right availability zone and location (e.g. 1A, 1B, 1C, 1D, East, West, Central, Europe, etc). I&#x27;ve had to go through the painful process of migration from 1B to 1C because I mistakenly purchased US-East-1B instead of US-East-1C.<p>Plus there is something to be said for Azure&#x27;s &quot;you can always upgrade it&quot; model. RIs are great price wise, but Amazon won&#x27;t let me buy e.g. a small RI and then pay the difference to upgrade the RI to a medium or large (even if they have to extend the RI to do so).<p>This is really the most welcome change (NOT listed in the blog):<p>&gt; On February 2nd 2015, Light and Medium Utilization Reserved Instances will no longer be available for purchase.<p>Light and medium RIs were too complicated. It was also too hard to track your RI usage in the way you&#x27;d need to to manage those plans, it is just easier to do on demand pricing with a few heavy utilisation RIs.
评论 #8689400 未加载
wise_young_man超过 10 年前
This is great. I kept telling my developer colleagues that AWS EC2 could get more affordable as we scaled and bought reserved instances.<p>As a bootstrapped startup paying for a year or three years upfront is quite a bit of a burden, but I think this is great progress and will make that easier on us.<p>I also like Google Cloud&#x27;s sustained use discounts because it is automatic. I&#x27;m not sure if AWS will ever do that, but since I&#x27;m such a huge fan of AWS, I&#x27;d love it. [1].<p>[1]: <a href="https://cloud.google.com/compute/pricing#sustained_use" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;cloud.google.com&#x2F;compute&#x2F;pricing#sustained_use</a>
jasonefrank超过 10 年前
I would also love to be able to move across instance families. Another reason not to commit for a long period of time. I&#x27;m willing to say &quot;I&#x27;m committed to using x amount of AWS computing power over the next 3 years&quot; but not if that will prevent me from using any of the new instance families that come out over that time frame.
评论 #8689792 未加载
prohor超过 10 年前
Still this is far less simple than Google&#x27;s &quot;sustained use&quot; discounts, where price automatically drops when I have more constant use pattern. Here I still need to plan upfront, assume my future usage patterns. It seems easier, but in fact you need to make the same decisions as previously.<p>I also wonder what happens if I make &quot;no upfront&quot; reservation and don&#x27;t use it? If nothing - why would I use on-demand, while I always can do reservation without upfront?
评论 #8689797 未加载
Yadi超过 10 年前
Ah Jeff! I love how this guy actually write and simplifies the technologies.<p>This is one easy way for non-cloud users to pickup EC2 and use it as hosting services and demystify the price VS usage behind it.
评论 #8689364 未加载