TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

The Real Story of the Write-Only-Memory

48 点作者 joe_bleau超过 10 年前

8 条评论

jcr超过 10 年前
The following pdf is roughly the same as the one linked in the article, but has better formatting&#x2F;ocr so it tends to be more effective when trolling your favorite EE friends.<p><a href="http://repeater-builder.com/molotora/gontor/25120-bw.pdf" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;repeater-builder.com&#x2F;molotora&#x2F;gontor&#x2F;25120-bw.pdf</a>
trsohmers超过 10 年前
The concept of WOM isn&#x27;t completely pointless for non von Neumann architectures, and could even be useful for von Neumann-esque SPMD or MPMD systolic array (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Systolic_array" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Systolic_array</a>) architectures that have strict execution models forced in the core to core wiring. While not completely free form, you would still have instructions and data being stored in the same space, it would be only readable by the individual PU is corresponds to. That PU would not write-back to that same memory, and instead could only write to an adjacent PU&#x27;s memory, which then would only be readable (and not writable) by that next PU in the line.<p>I&#x27;ve been wanting to implement such an architecture on an FPGA for a while now... may do so over this winter break.
评论 #8762514 未加载
danjayh超过 10 年前
Reminds me of the retro encabulator (which was actually a video, not a data sheet) <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NpnEiOOfu1Q" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=NpnEiOOfu1Q</a><p>&quot;The line-up consisted simply of six hydrocoptic marzul vanes so fitted to the ambaphascient lunar wain shaft that side fumbling was effectively prevented.&quot;<p>Ahhh, classic.
评论 #8761932 未加载
jontro超过 10 年前
Looks like a perfect backing device for &#x2F;dev&#x2F;null
评论 #8760623 未加载
评论 #8760847 未加载
robert_tweed超过 10 年前
Perhaps not write-only memory per se, but write-only registers are a pretty common thing if you do any hardware-level programming.<p>Though admittedly this isn&#x27;t something I&#x27;ve done for a number of years, IIRC both the VGA and the original Sound Blaster had write-only registers which you would use to request some change in state, and some other registers that would reflect the actual current state of the device if&#x2F;when the request was honoured.<p>Of course these are not write-only in the sense that <i>nothing</i> can read their contents, since they are provided as an interface to some coprocessor like a GPU or a sound chip. That coprocessor can of course read the incoming data. They are more like the hardware equivalent of mutator methods on top of private properties.
nvader超过 10 年前
&gt; If the device fails, you have exceeded the ragings.<p>Minor typo, or anachronistic use of early 21st Century slang that suggests time traveller activity?
vardump超过 10 年前
<i>&quot;Lawson’s contributions too as he was a real comedian with lots of semiconductor experience. He could have invented the WOM concept. He did invent the “SCROM”. I doubt if any one else knows what that is. I’ll add later.&quot;</i><p>&quot;SCROM&quot; must mean Self-Clear Read-Only Memory?
评论 #8760906 未加载
TazeTSchnitzel超过 10 年前
Oh goodness, this press release.<p>&gt; Dr. Morris Breakthrough, a consultant on leave from Uisge Beatha, Ltd., of Kirkcudbrightshire, Scotland<p>I lost it.