It's disheartening that the Slate analysis does not calculate the approximate cost in dollars of alternate leaving-things-plugged-in strategies.<p>Even when prices are distorted by non-competitive markets, subsidies, regulation, and so forth, they remain vaguely related to the actual opportunity costs of a path of action.<p>According to this chart, the average retail price of a kilowatt-hour in the US varies from about 8¢ (West Virginia) to 22¢ (Hawaii).<p><a href="http://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/electricity/epm/table5_6_a.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/electricity/epm/table5_6_a.html</a><p>So given Slate's estimate that leaving a phone plugged in an unnecessary 8 hours every day for a year would use 6.5 kWh, we're talking about a cost over the whole year of 54¢ to $1.43.<p>Is a full year of fussing with the charger to minimize hours-plugged-in worth a savings of $1.43 in time or energy? If once, over many years of following this strategy, it means your phone dies at an inopportune moment, was it worth the years of savings?<p>We spend energy all the time for convenience, and $2/year for not having to micromanage a device that's supposed to make life easier is a bargain.