TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

What makes teams successful? 150,000 GitHub projects analyzed

79 点作者 greg超过 10 年前

4 条评论

lkrubner超过 10 年前
This sounds like they are reversing the likely cause-and-effect:<p>&quot;Even in larger teams, high-impact teams have core and support cadres. A small number — sometimes just one — of the team do the majority of the work, while other, non-core members act in support roles.&quot;<p>Successful projects will tend to bring in a larger number of contributors, most of whom will only make a few contributions. So successful projects will tend to have this pattern. But it is the success of the project that creates that pattern, not the other way around. Lots of projects are not successful, so no one ever contributes to them.
评论 #8797988 未加载
评论 #8797543 未加载
评论 #8798888 未加载
评论 #8799109 未加载
评论 #8797918 未加载
jodrellblank超过 10 年前
In the teams where one person does more than all others combined, why is that described as &quot;a successful team&quot; rather than &quot;a successful person who succeeds despite a bunch of hangers-on&quot;?
评论 #8797683 未加载
codexon超过 10 年前
I find that most mature projects are incredibly hesitant to accept patches.<p>I have found critical bugs in some projects and the people with repo access let the pull request sit there for a year or more.
评论 #8799142 未加载
评论 #8798067 未加载
yalogin超过 10 年前
The summary at the top seems to indicate that a team will have high impact if one guy does all the work and have a &quot;team&quot; unimportant work. So not quite what I was hoping to see.