TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Open-source physics engines (2011)

53 点作者 StylifyYourBlog超过 10 年前

3 条评论

SloopJon超过 10 年前
ODE seemed promising when I looked at it several years ago. Bullet is also quite popular. Searching for a comparison of the two led me to <i>An Evaluation of Open Source Physics Engines for Use in Virtual Reality Assembly Simulations</i>:<p><a href="http://elib.dlr.de/79462/1/74320346.pdf" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;elib.dlr.de&#x2F;79462&#x2F;1&#x2F;74320346.pdf</a><p>The authors, who were already using Bullet, concluded that &quot;Newton and PhysX would be valuable candidates to compete with Bullet for integration in our current simulation environment.&quot;
Scramblejams超过 10 年前
Bullet seems to be the most mature of the game-oriented physics engines, but its story for those of us not using C++ is significantly less compelling. Bullet 2 doesn&#x27;t have much of a C API, while Bullet 3 requires a high-end desktop card, considerably narrowing your customer base. Guess I&#x27;ll have to re-evaluate the alternatives or resign myself to a truckload of shim C++.<p>C++&#x27;s generally poor interoperability has been annoying me since the 90s. :-(
Zardoz84超过 10 年前
For .NET there is BEPU <a href="http://bepu.squarespace.com/" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;bepu.squarespace.com&#x2F;</a>