TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Is Global Poverty Falling? Not in Absolute Terms

9 点作者 mgunes超过 10 年前

3 条评论

gojomo超过 10 年前
This headline and story frame relies on a strained redefinition of what people usually mean by an &quot;absolute&quot; measure of poverty.<p>The source paper doesn&#x27;t have this problem: neither its title nor abstract refer to &quot;absolute&quot; poverty or even &quot;global poverty&quot; (which would tend make people think of rates-of-poverty). The paper clearly considers just the &quot;floor&quot; experienced by the &quot;poorest&quot; (of which there are fewer).<p>In discussing its own data sources, the paper also says outright:<p><i>&quot;The latest results from these data confirm past findings that the developing world has seen impressive progress against absolute poverty over the last 30 years, with signs of acceleration since 2000.&quot;</i><p>The WSJ story&#x27;s author&#x2F;editor&#x2F;headline-writer should be embarrassed by the confusion-creating spin they&#x27;ve added.
cperciva超过 10 年前
What a strange article. It seems to be saying that the dramatic reduction in the number of poor people over the past two decades doesn&#x27;t matter because the poorest person in the world now is just as poor as the poorest person in the world was in 1990.<p>I&#x27;m pretty sure that the people who were poor in 1990 and aren&#x27;t poor any more would differ.
rgbrenner超过 10 年前
The actual paper is a little clearer than the blog: <a href="http://papers.nber.org/tmp/80245-w20791.pdf" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;papers.nber.org&#x2F;tmp&#x2F;80245-w20791.pdf</a><p>Basically, it says that although the income of the poorest has risen, their consumption has risen at a much lower rate (and significantly lower than the median) -- see figure 2 on pg 28.<p>Table 1.. says consumption (by those under 1.25&#x2F;day) has increased from 0.73 to 0.88 over the past 30 years. So a 20% increase.<p>The main point seems to be that the poorest have increased their consumption at a lower rate than the median.. so therefore they&#x27;re being &#x27;left behind&#x27;.<p>But it seems to me that consumption would just be a lagging indicator of income...
评论 #8833352 未加载