Until they get rid of that annoying endorsement system, I submit to SSRN. The endorsement system is a major hurdle for unaffiliated publishers and it still doesn't keep nonsense and wrong stuff from occasionally appearing on the site. The traditional peer review process is very time consuming and difficult, and I think it's time to replace it with an open review or some more democratic form of review. The future of academic publishing could be journals being replaced by Wikis that allow researchers to continuously update stuff in real time, making the results available to public free of charge like this example of page that been updated since 2012 <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Stockequation/sandbox" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Stockequation/sandbox</a><p>If somethings sounds promising and or passes the smell test, researchers may try to verify the results independently , with or without peer review