TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Introduction to FreeBSD for Linux Users

72 点作者 pselbert超过 10 年前

3 条评论

sophacles超过 10 年前
I&#x27;d really like to see one of these get written one day from a couple of deeper perspectives... The difference between Linux and FreeBSD is bigger than just &quot;they are variants on a theme&quot;, even if this is true at the sysadmin level, and even from the application programming point of view.<p>At a deeper level - things like &quot;non-posix&quot; syscalls vary a lot, and the subsystems they interact with are wildly different. Some of it is again variations on a theme - a special syscall vs an ioctl, or what not, but the way those subsystems interact starts becoming very interesting at a systems architecture level. For instance, I might want to write a specialized networking tool mostly in userland in linux, via nf_queue, whereas in FreeBSD I might want to split the operations between the kernel (via netgraph) and userland (via the pf equivalent to nf_queue).<p>It would be nice to see a nice write-up, or survey of writeups of the differences at that level.
评论 #8888902 未加载
lucb1e超过 10 年前
What I like about this article is that it seems very unbiased. Most articles highlight a lot of key features from (GNU&#x2F;)Linux or FreeBSD, depending on whom they&#x27;re written by. This reads like a basic overview of how the systems came to be and why they work the way they work.
hetman超过 10 年前
I would be interested to know the reasoning behind using different shells for interactive sessions vs. scripting on FreeBSD. Wouldn&#x27;t it be easier to pick one for both? Is this just historical legacy?
评论 #8888854 未加载
评论 #8889738 未加载
评论 #8888789 未加载