TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

How did Einstein Think?

159 点作者 srsamarthyam超过 10 年前

10 条评论

maskedinvader超过 10 年前
For someone who recently read a lot about Einstein and his work and learn what his theory actually accomplishes, this was a great read. I am glad I took 15 minutes of my time to read this paper. Personally I feel it sucks that almost every educated person can recollect his famous equation but a small fraction actually know what it is all about and how his work changed our understanding of space and time. I recommend anyone interested to learn more can check out this book by Author James Malcolm Bird , its on amazon [1] and free on google play [2].<p>[1] - <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Einsteins-Theories-Relativity-And-Gravitation/dp/116462959X" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.amazon.com&#x2F;Einsteins-Theories-Relativity-And-Grav...</a><p>[2] - <a href="https://play.google.com/store/books/details/James_Malcolm_Bird_Einstein_s_Theories_of_Relativi?id=7e85AAAAMAAJ" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;play.google.com&#x2F;store&#x2F;books&#x2F;details&#x2F;James_Malcolm_Bi...</a><p>edit: for formatting
评论 #8925954 未加载
评论 #8925367 未加载
peterwwillis超过 10 年前
&quot;Der Urquell aller technischen Errungenschaften ist die göttliche Neugier und der Spieltrieb des bastelnden und grübelnden Forschers und nicht minder die konstruktive Phantasie des technischen Erfinders&quot;<p>- Albert Einstein<p><a href="https://www.ige.ch/en/about-us/einstein/einstein-at-the-patent-office.html" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.ige.ch&#x2F;en&#x2F;about-us&#x2F;einstein&#x2F;einstein-at-the-pate...</a><p>&quot;He was denied any teaching position from just about every major University in Europe. This was mostly based on the fact that Albert approached Physics as a &quot;New age day dreamer&quot; (e.g.: thought experiments) rather than primarily from mathematical models or experimental insights. One way he dealt with the rejections was through a discussion group he formed with other workers at the Patent office that he self-mockingly named &quot;The Olympia Academy&quot;, which met regularly to discuss science and philosophy. They studied the works of Henri Poincaré, Ernst Mach, and David Hume, which influenced his scientific and philosophical outlook.&quot;<p><a href="https://www.quora.com/How-many-patents-did-Albert-Einstein-have" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.quora.com&#x2F;How-many-patents-did-Albert-Einstein-h...</a>
评论 #8926656 未加载
etr71115超过 10 年前
FWIW, Einstein was also an avid musician. In Walter Isaacson&#x27;s biography, &quot;His Life and Universe&quot;, Einstein was caught in the middle of a meal when he began to ruminate on the Theory of Special Relativity. His wife described the next two weeks as a solitary exchange between meditation in his office and fiddling on the piano. He credited music to being a source of inspiration and creativity.
评论 #8926542 未加载
评论 #8925799 未加载
评论 #8927322 未加载
tjradcliffe超过 10 年前
Investigating how a great scientist thought is interesting, but should come with a YMMV warning. We see the same thing in the business press that focuses on &quot;the characteristics of successful CEOs&quot; and the like.<p>The interesting question is not &quot;How many successful people in field X have characteristics Y?&quot; but &quot;How many unsuccessful people in field X also have characteristics Y?&quot; If we don&#x27;t have an answer to that--and we generally don&#x27;t, because unsuccessful people are relatively hard to identify compared to the successful ones, and are generally considered a less interesting subject to study--then we can&#x27;t say much about the degree to which characteristics Y contribute to success in field X.<p>There is no doubt Einstein&#x27;s doggedness, patience, willingness to learn new methods, physical intuition and deep study of the physics of his time all contributed to his success, but there were likely quite a few people who had similar characteristics. That Einstein succeeded where they did not may be due to various factors, including various forms of luck.<p>As the article suggests, Einstein&#x27;s strengths were well-suited to the problems he focused on in his early career, and less well-suited to the problems he focused on in his later career. That is a form of luck, albeit a more subtle and powerful one than &quot;his guesses just happened to be right.&quot;
granfalloon超过 10 年前
&quot;The words or the language, as they are written or spoken, do not seem to play any role in my mechanism of thought.&quot;<p>This is interesting to me. When I&#x27;m working on something difficult I often find my thought process to be very &quot;verbal.&quot; Kind of like an internal monologue, talking myself through the problem. It&#x27;s fascinating to think that my mental experience might be so profoundly different from someone else&#x27;s.
评论 #8926734 未加载
评论 #8926732 未加载
评论 #8926740 未加载
评论 #8926953 未加载
mbrubeck超过 10 年前
I love how this paper doesn&#x27;t overreach, but instead carefully admits what we can and can&#x27;t conclude from the historical evidence.
heck0045超过 10 年前
The end of the article laments Einstein&#x27;s retreat to &#x27;simple mathematics&#x27; instead of following Bohr and company toward the complexity of Quantum Mechanics -- but this recent wired article suggests that perhaps Einstein was right all along: <a href="http://www.wired.com/2014/06/the-new-quantum-reality/" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.wired.com&#x2F;2014&#x2F;06&#x2F;the-new-quantum-reality&#x2F;</a>
评论 #8928934 未加载
titzer超过 10 年前
Like many people, Einstein&#x27;s life and work has been fascinating to me, but in comparison to other brilliant scientists of the twentieth century, there are at least a handful if not a dozen or couple of dozen people who were and are equally as intelligent, brilliant, and more prolific.<p>That said, I find Einstein-worship annoying.<p>The cultural obsession with Einstein and cult of personality detracts from the reality that scientific achievement, knowledge, intelligence and wisdom all lie on a multi-dimensional spectrum, they aren&#x27;t innate, and like any skill, mathematics and scientific knowledge can be learned.<p>Even more so to say that there have been other geniuses at least at the level of Einstein who didn&#x27;t land in the position of theoretical physics that afforded them the same level impact.<p>As for special relativity, based on the development of physics and mathematics of the time 1880-1910, I think it was a toss-up who would have discovered it if Einstein had actually fallen off that mountain in Switzerland in grade school and not been save by his classmate.
评论 #8926011 未加载
评论 #8925717 未加载
评论 #8927817 未加载
评论 #8927034 未加载
评论 #8927413 未加载
评论 #8928303 未加载
评论 #8926959 未加载
评论 #8925800 未加载
评论 #8926935 未加载
评论 #8925592 未加载
yodsanklai超过 10 年前
I once read a crazy but amusing &quot;psychoanalytic&quot; interpretation about Einstein discoveries. His name &quot;Einstein&quot; can be parsed: Ein-s-t-Ein, which can be seen as &quot;one - space - time - one&quot; (ein is german for one). He was predetermined to see space and time as a single thing!
johnchristopher超过 10 年前
Off-topic: That&#x27;s a bizarre layout.
评论 #8925410 未加载
评论 #8925278 未加载