TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Diagnostic page for Google.com

410 点作者 dushyant超过 10 年前

18 条评论

q2超过 10 年前
Few honest questions:<p>1. If Google detects something as malware, i.e. google software knows that it can be dangerous to users, then why it cannot prevent itself from acting as intermediary? Also, why it does not stop hosting malware?<p>2. &gt;&gt;&gt; Malicious software is hosted on 279 domain(s), including 24corp-shop.com&#x2F;, abu-farhan.com&#x2F;, soaksoak.ru&#x2F;.<p>These web domains do not belong to Google. It seems google is downloading several pages onto its server for various purposes. Is it legal in all countries?<p>From the architecture point of view, is it difficult to sandbox&#x2F;protect user facing google.com search engine from the above websites all the time so that if malware is there, do not let it effect search engine or other major parts. Users are not security-literate.<p>3. What should I do as user? Just ignore this assuming that this is for webmasters and not for ordinary users?<p>Honestly, for me personally, malware on google is unimaginable, since we consider it as gold standard on the web.
评论 #8936451 未加载
评论 #8936432 未加载
评论 #8938547 未加载
mempko超过 10 年前
And for DuckDuckGo, <a href="http://www.google.com/safebrowsing/diagnostic?site=duckduckgo.com" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.google.com&#x2F;safebrowsing&#x2F;diagnostic?site=duckduckg...</a>
评论 #8935560 未加载
评论 #8940262 未加载
diakritikal超过 10 年前
Would some kind soul please describe to me what this does, my corporate eager beaver network admins seem to consider this some kind of problem site and it&#x27;s URL is blocked by our gateway proxy.
评论 #8934498 未加载
评论 #8934503 未加载
评论 #8934510 未加载
评论 #8934952 未加载
27182818284超过 10 年前
I just tried with a known, compromised site and that scanner said it was OK, so be cautious.
评论 #8938954 未加载
ldng超过 10 年前
AS36040 (YOUTUBE), AS43515 (YOUTUBE), AS15169 (GOOGLE), AS54113 (FASTLY), AS36459 (GITHUB), AS16509 (AMAZON-02), AS14618 (AMAZON-AES), AS16509 (AMAZON-02), AS38895 (AMAZON-AS-AP) and so on.<p>Could someone tell me more about those network codes ?<p>Where do they come from ? Specifics to Google or following some standard ?
评论 #8935897 未加载
评论 #8935674 未加载
评论 #8935625 未加载
评论 #8935618 未加载
spdy超过 10 年前
How can google.com be used to serve malicious content?
评论 #8934540 未加载
评论 #8934737 未加载
评论 #8936310 未加载
评论 #8935532 未加载
评论 #8935102 未加载
评论 #8934539 未加载
dmd超过 10 年前
The diagnostic page doesn&#x27;t appear to always be strictly accurate. For instance, it says &quot;Google has not visited this site within the past 90 days.&quot; for many of my sites which it has crawled daily for years.
评论 #8934896 未加载
acd超过 10 年前
<a href="http://www.google.com/safebrowsing/diagnostic?site=www.sourceforge.net" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.google.com&#x2F;safebrowsing&#x2F;diagnostic?site=www.sourc...</a><p>&quot;Of the 10 pages we tested on the site over the past 90 days, 0 page(s) resulted in malicious software being downloaded and installed without user consent.&quot;<p>What about bundleware fail?<p><a href="http://httpshaming.tumblr.com/post/95068402386/filezilla-sourceforge-installer-insecure" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;httpshaming.tumblr.com&#x2F;post&#x2F;95068402386&#x2F;filezilla-sou...</a>
pherocity_超过 10 年前
My personal site is literally safer than google by google&#x27;s own tool.
评论 #8936354 未加载
cwmma超过 10 年前
Is this due to people with viruses&#x2F;compromised routers going to their home screen (google) and having that redirected to some malicious page?
评论 #8934552 未加载
yaddayadda超过 10 年前
On the one hand, I feel smugly better about using another browser[1]. But how could I feel this without google (i.e. google.com&#x2F;safebrowsing&#x2F;diagnostic) to provide the ammunition? I&#x27;m so confused now.<p>[1] <a href="http://www.google.com/safebrowsing/diagnostic?site=duckduckgo.com" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.google.com&#x2F;safebrowsing&#x2F;diagnostic?site=duckduckg...</a>
评论 #8934588 未加载
评论 #8934907 未加载
评论 #8934544 未加载
评论 #8934779 未加载
NextPerception超过 10 年前
So now all my domains have a &quot;permanent record&quot;. I am having grade school flashbacks.
评论 #8935070 未加载
alexyoung超过 10 年前
The comparison with Bing is interesting:<p><a href="http://www.google.com/safebrowsing/diagnostic?site=bing.com" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.google.com&#x2F;safebrowsing&#x2F;diagnostic?site=bing.com</a><p>&quot;This site was hosted on 25 networks&quot; vs. 3, 1 virus vs. 503.
评论 #8938672 未加载
nissimk超过 10 年前
Is it the ads? Most malware is distributed through ads. I don&#x27;t think there&#x27;s a risk in AdWords text based ads, but the display ads frequently include malicious software. That and download.com. I&#x27;m glad I use the ad blocker.
评论 #8937775 未加载
blossoms超过 10 年前
GitHub&#x27;s is also <i>not</i> clean: <a href="https://www.google.com/safebrowsing/diagnostic?site=github.com" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.google.com&#x2F;safebrowsing&#x2F;diagnostic?site=github.c...</a>
评论 #8935797 未加载
flurpitude超过 10 年前
Odd that it provides links to the sites that hosted malicious content. That seems like a poor design decision.
评论 #8935406 未加载
salibhai超过 10 年前
This is hilarious
评论 #8937780 未加载
known超过 10 年前
<a href="http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=microsoft.com" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;validator.w3.org&#x2F;check?uri=microsoft.com</a>
评论 #8935859 未加载