TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

What should you say to a parent scared of Wi-Fi?

24 点作者 CaptainMorgan超过 15 年前

7 条评论

dazzawazza超过 15 年前
Anyone who has ever been to a school meeting where there are a large number of parents will realise that some adults are scared of the universe and everything it contains.
评论 #896601 未加载
danw超过 15 年前
<i>"Schools need wireless networks; the pupils need a device (handheld computer, or laptop) each, which they have access to whenever it is needed"</i><p>Why do we need one laptop per child in a school? Computers are useful tools but hardly central to learning.
评论 #896538 未加载
StrawberryFrog超过 15 年前
Quite telling is the data point (not a very accurate data point, but the only one around), that the radiation from wi-fi was below detectable levels, but the child's night-light was not. If wi-fi is fearsome, is it fearsome compared to what?
评论 #896831 未加载
评论 #896638 未加载
ulf超过 15 年前
A killer argument in those cases (though not always applicable) is to ask the people if they are smoking. If so, they do not have any reason to be afraid of any environmental influence, since smoking will definitely kill them first.
评论 #896568 未加载
评论 #896553 未加载
cool-RR超过 15 年前
I don't understand why everyone is so sure that Wi-Fi is not dangerous.<p>I know a few things about Physics and radiation, and I know Wi-Fi is supposed to be in the same frequency as wireless phones and microwaves, but still I would prefer not to be too close to a wireless router (Although of course, in this time and age I often have to put this concern aside and spend a lot of time close to routers anyway.)<p>Firstly, research about radiation, and generally research regarding health matters, is always vague and ambivalent, probably because of the big commercial interests involved.<p>Secondly, the fact that wireless routers "operate in 2.4GHz like wireless phones" does not calm me. How do you know they transmit only in this range? How do you know it's exactly the frequency that matters? Maybe it's some combination of frequency, amplitude, and something else? How do you know wireless phones aren't dangerous in the first place?<p>I've worked enough with technical things to know that eventually, you can't really know with certainty whether something will work. (Or in this case, whether something will not harm your health.) Sometimes everything makes sense, but you're still getting a different result.<p>If this helps you accept my point, I think Knuth's quotation is relevant: "Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not tried it."
评论 #896888 未加载
评论 #896823 未加载
评论 #897498 未加载
评论 #896674 未加载
评论 #896673 未加载
Oranj超过 15 年前
Introducing foil hats as part of the uniform should calm the parents.
gaius超过 15 年前
You know, recently in the UK, there was a case where the authorities said a woman was too stupid to have children:<p><a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/politics/scotland/6365363/Social-services-to-take-baby-from-teenager-deemed-too-stupid-to-marry.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/politics/scotland...</a><p>This law should be applied in this case.